Advanced search
1 file | 2.76 MB Add to list

A systematic review of studies that estimated the burden of chronic non-communicable rare diseases using disability-adjusted life years

Author
Organization
Abstract
Background Initiatives aiming to assess the impact of rare diseases on population health might be hampered due to the complexity of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) estimation. This study aimed to give insight into the epidemiological data sources and methodological approaches used in studies that estimated DALYs for chronic non-communicable rare diseases (CNCRD), and compare its results. Methods A literature strategy was developed for peer-review search in Embase and Medline, and also performed on grey literature databases and population health and/or rare disease-focused websites. We included studies that determined the burden of CNCRD listed on the Orphanet's and/or the Genetic and Rare Diseases information center (GARD) websites. We excluded communicable and occupational diseases, rare cancers, and cost-effectiveness/benefit studies. Two researchers independently screened the identified records and extracted data from the final included studies. We used the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) statement to assess the quality of reporting of the included studies. The data synthesis depicted the studies' characteristics, their distribution by geographic coverage and the group of disease(s) they focused on, the methods and data input sources used and estimated DALY per case. Results In total, 533 titles were screened, and 18 studies were included. These studies covered 19 different CNCRDs, of which most fell in the disease category "Diseases of the nervous system". Diverse methodological approaches and data input sources were observed among burden of CNCRD studies. A wide range of DALY per case was observed across the different studies and diseases included. Conclusions A low number of burden of CNCRD studies was observed and most estimates resulted from multi-country studies, underlining the importance of international cooperation to further CNCRD research. This study revealed a lack of epidemiological data and harmonization of methods which hampers comparisons across burden of CNCRD studies.
Keywords
Disability-adjusted life years, Rare diseases, Methods, Population health, Review, PEDIATRIC-SURGERY, GLOBAL BURDEN, MORTALITY, LOST, CANCERS, EUROPE, POLICY, DEATH, KENYA, NEED

Downloads

  • oliveira2024systematic.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.76 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Oliveira, Claudia Cruz, et al. “A Systematic Review of Studies That Estimated the Burden of Chronic Non-Communicable Rare Diseases Using Disability-Adjusted Life Years.” ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, vol. 19, no. 1, BMC, 2024, doi:10.1186/s13023-024-03342-3.
APA
Oliveira, C. C., Charalampous, P., Delaye, J., Grad, D. A., Kolkhir, P., Mechili, E. A., … Haagsma, J. A. (2024). A systematic review of studies that estimated the burden of chronic non-communicable rare diseases using disability-adjusted life years. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03342-3
Chicago author-date
Oliveira, Claudia Cruz, Periklis Charalampous, Julien Delaye, Diana Alecsandra Grad, Pavel Kolkhir, Enkeleint A. Mechili, Brigid Unim, Brecht Devleesschauwer, and Juanita A. Haagsma. 2024. “A Systematic Review of Studies That Estimated the Burden of Chronic Non-Communicable Rare Diseases Using Disability-Adjusted Life Years.” ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03342-3.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Oliveira, Claudia Cruz, Periklis Charalampous, Julien Delaye, Diana Alecsandra Grad, Pavel Kolkhir, Enkeleint A. Mechili, Brigid Unim, Brecht Devleesschauwer, and Juanita A. Haagsma. 2024. “A Systematic Review of Studies That Estimated the Burden of Chronic Non-Communicable Rare Diseases Using Disability-Adjusted Life Years.” ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES 19 (1). doi:10.1186/s13023-024-03342-3.
Vancouver
1.
Oliveira CC, Charalampous P, Delaye J, Grad DA, Kolkhir P, Mechili EA, et al. A systematic review of studies that estimated the burden of chronic non-communicable rare diseases using disability-adjusted life years. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES. 2024;19(1).
IEEE
[1]
C. C. Oliveira et al., “A systematic review of studies that estimated the burden of chronic non-communicable rare diseases using disability-adjusted life years,” ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, vol. 19, no. 1, 2024.
@article{01J7R1NGYMDFZ186834EQ2EW43,
  abstract     = {{Background Initiatives aiming to assess the impact of rare diseases on population health might be hampered due to the complexity of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) estimation. This study aimed to give insight into the epidemiological data sources and methodological approaches used in studies that estimated DALYs for chronic non-communicable rare diseases (CNCRD), and compare its results. Methods A literature strategy was developed for peer-review search in Embase and Medline, and also performed on grey literature databases and population health and/or rare disease-focused websites. We included studies that determined the burden of CNCRD listed on the Orphanet's and/or the Genetic and Rare Diseases information center (GARD) websites. We excluded communicable and occupational diseases, rare cancers, and cost-effectiveness/benefit studies. Two researchers independently screened the identified records and extracted data from the final included studies. We used the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) statement to assess the quality of reporting of the included studies. The data synthesis depicted the studies' characteristics, their distribution by geographic coverage and the group of disease(s) they focused on, the methods and data input sources used and estimated DALY per case. Results In total, 533 titles were screened, and 18 studies were included. These studies covered 19 different CNCRDs, of which most fell in the disease category "Diseases of the nervous system". Diverse methodological approaches and data input sources were observed among burden of CNCRD studies. A wide range of DALY per case was observed across the different studies and diseases included. Conclusions A low number of burden of CNCRD studies was observed and most estimates resulted from multi-country studies, underlining the importance of international cooperation to further CNCRD research. This study revealed a lack of epidemiological data and harmonization of methods which hampers comparisons across burden of CNCRD studies.}},
  articleno    = {{333}},
  author       = {{Oliveira, Claudia Cruz and Charalampous, Periklis and Delaye, Julien and Grad, Diana Alecsandra and Kolkhir, Pavel and Mechili, Enkeleint A. and Unim, Brigid and Devleesschauwer, Brecht and Haagsma, Juanita A.}},
  issn         = {{1750-1172}},
  journal      = {{ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES}},
  keywords     = {{Disability-adjusted life years,Rare diseases,Methods,Population health,Review,PEDIATRIC-SURGERY,GLOBAL BURDEN,MORTALITY,LOST,CANCERS,EUROPE,POLICY,DEATH,KENYA,NEED}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{17}},
  publisher    = {{BMC}},
  title        = {{A systematic review of studies that estimated the burden of chronic non-communicable rare diseases using disability-adjusted life years}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03342-3}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: