Advanced search
1 file | 1.24 MB Add to list

Dual-task interference in the assessment of listening effort : results of normal-hearing adults, cochlear implant users, and hearing aid users

Dorien Ceuleers (UGent) , Sofie Degeest (UGent) , Freya Swinnen (UGent) , Nele Baudonck (UGent) , Katrien Kestens (UGent) , Ingeborg Dhooge (UGent) and Hannah Keppler (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to assess dual-task interference (i.e., changes between the dual-task and baseline condition) in a listening effort dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing (NH) adults, hearing aid (HA) users, and cochlear implant (CI) users. Method: Three groups of 31 participants were included: (a) NH adults, (b) HA users, and (c) CI users. The dual-task paradigm consisted of a primary speech understanding task in a quiet condition, and a favorable and unfavorable noise condition, and a secondary visual memory task. Dual-task interference was calculated for both tasks, and participants were classified based on their patterns of interference. Descriptive analyses were established and differences between the three groups were examined. Results: The descriptive results showed varying patterns of dual-task interference between the three listening conditions. Most participants showed the pattern of visual memory interference (i.e., worse results for the secondary task in the dual-task condition and no difference for the primary task) in the quiet condition, whereas the pattern of speech understanding priority trade-off (i.e., worse results for the secondary task in the dual-task condition and better results for the primary task) was most prominent in the unfavorable noise condition. Particularly, in HA and CI users, this shift was seen. However, the patterns of dual-task interference were not statistically different between the three groups. Conclusions: Results of this study may provide additional insight into the interpretation of dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort in diverse participant groups. It highlights the importance of considering both the primary and secondary tasks for accurate interpretation of results.
Keywords
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT, SPEECH, NOISE, RECOGNITION, AGE, FATIGUE, SOUNDS, MOCA

Downloads

  • Dual-task interference and listening effort Author Accepted Manuscript.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.24 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Ceuleers, Dorien, et al. “Dual-Task Interference in the Assessment of Listening Effort : Results of Normal-Hearing Adults, Cochlear Implant Users, and Hearing Aid Users.” JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, vol. 67, no. 9, 2024, pp. 3201–16, doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00636.
APA
Ceuleers, D., Degeest, S., Swinnen, F., Baudonck, N., Kestens, K., Dhooge, I., & Keppler, H. (2024). Dual-task interference in the assessment of listening effort : results of normal-hearing adults, cochlear implant users, and hearing aid users. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 67(9), 3201–3216. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00636
Chicago author-date
Ceuleers, Dorien, Sofie Degeest, Freya Swinnen, Nele Baudonck, Katrien Kestens, Ingeborg Dhooge, and Hannah Keppler. 2024. “Dual-Task Interference in the Assessment of Listening Effort : Results of Normal-Hearing Adults, Cochlear Implant Users, and Hearing Aid Users.” JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH 67 (9): 3201–16. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00636.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Ceuleers, Dorien, Sofie Degeest, Freya Swinnen, Nele Baudonck, Katrien Kestens, Ingeborg Dhooge, and Hannah Keppler. 2024. “Dual-Task Interference in the Assessment of Listening Effort : Results of Normal-Hearing Adults, Cochlear Implant Users, and Hearing Aid Users.” JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH 67 (9): 3201–3216. doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00636.
Vancouver
1.
Ceuleers D, Degeest S, Swinnen F, Baudonck N, Kestens K, Dhooge I, et al. Dual-task interference in the assessment of listening effort : results of normal-hearing adults, cochlear implant users, and hearing aid users. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH. 2024;67(9):3201–16.
IEEE
[1]
D. Ceuleers et al., “Dual-task interference in the assessment of listening effort : results of normal-hearing adults, cochlear implant users, and hearing aid users,” JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 3201–3216, 2024.
@article{01J4NY11HEGD9NNKDAZJHE949X,
  abstract     = {{Purpose:  The purpose of the current study was to assess dual-task interference (i.e., changes between the dual-task and baseline condition) in a listening effort dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing (NH) adults, hearing aid (HA) users, and cochlear implant (CI) users.
Method: Three groups of 31 participants were included: (a) NH adults, (b) HA users, and (c) CI users. The dual-task paradigm consisted of a primary speech understanding task in a quiet condition, and a favorable and unfavorable noise condition, and a secondary visual memory task. Dual-task interference was calculated for both tasks, and participants were classified based on their patterns of interference. Descriptive analyses were established and differences between the three groups were examined.
Results: The descriptive results showed varying patterns of dual-task interference between the three listening conditions. Most participants showed the pattern of visual memory interference (i.e., worse results for the secondary task in the dual-task condition and no difference for the primary task) in the quiet condition, whereas the pattern of speech understanding priority trade-off (i.e., worse results for the secondary task in the dual-task condition and better results for the primary task) was most prominent in the unfavorable noise condition. Particularly, in HA and CI users, this shift was seen. However, the patterns of dual-task interference were not statistically different between the three groups.
Conclusions: Results of this study may provide additional insight into the interpretation of dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort in diverse participant groups. It highlights the importance of considering both the primary and secondary tasks for accurate interpretation of results.}},
  author       = {{Ceuleers, Dorien and Degeest, Sofie and Swinnen, Freya and Baudonck, Nele and Kestens, Katrien and Dhooge, Ingeborg and Keppler, Hannah}},
  issn         = {{1092-4388}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH}},
  keywords     = {{MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT,SPEECH,NOISE,RECOGNITION,AGE,FATIGUE,SOUNDS,MOCA}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{9}},
  pages        = {{3201--3216}},
  title        = {{Dual-task interference in the assessment of listening effort : results of normal-hearing adults, cochlear implant users, and hearing aid users}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00636}},
  volume       = {{67}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: