Advanced search
1 file | 2.61 MB Add to list

Evidence for simultaneous muscle atrophy and hypertrophy in response to resistance training in humans

Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Purpose: Human skeletal muscle has the profound ability to hypertrophy in response to resistance training (RT). Yet, this has a high energy and protein cost and is presumably mainly restricted to recruited muscles. It remains largely unknown what happens with non-recruited muscles during RT. This study investigated the volume changes of 17 recruited and 13 non-recruited muscles during a 10-week single-joint RT program targeting upper arm and upper leg musculature. Methods: Muscle volume changes were measured by manual or automatic 3D segmentation in 21 RT novices. Subjects ate ad libitum during the study and energy and protein intake were assessed by self-reported diaries. Results: Post-training, all recruited muscles increased in volume (range: +2.2% to +17.7%, p < 0.05) while the non-recruited adductor magnus (mean: -1.5 ± 3.1%, p = 0.038) and soleus (-2.4 ± 2.3%, p = 0.0004) decreased in volume. Net muscle growth (r = 0.453, p = 0.045) and changes in adductor magnus volume (r = 0.450, p = 0.047) were positively associated with protein intake. Changes in total non-recruited muscle volume (r = 0.469, p = 0.037), adductor magnus (r = 0.640, p = 0.002), adductor longus (r = 0.465, p = 0.039) and soleus muscle volume (r = 0.481, p = 0.032) were positively related to energy intake (p < 0.05). When subjects were divided into a HIGH or LOW energy intake group, overall non-recruited muscle volume (-1.7 ± 2.0%), adductor longus (-5.6 ± 3.7%), adductor magnus (-2.8 ± 2.4%) and soleus volume (-3.7 ± 1.8%) decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in the LOW but not the HIGH group. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study documenting that some non-recruited muscles significantly atrophy during a period of resistance training. Our data therefore suggest muscle mass reallocation, i.e., that hypertrophy in recruited muscles takes place at the expense of atrophy in non-recruited muscles, especially when energy and protein availability are limited.
Keywords
RESISTANCE TRAINING, ATROPHY, HYPERTROPHY, NON-RECRUITED MUSCLES, RECRUITED MUSCLES, ENERGY INTAKE, PROTEIN INTAKE, RESTING METABOLIC-RATE, LOWER-LIMB MUSCLES, LEAN MASS GAIN, FAT-FREE MASS, PROTEIN-SYNTHESIS, BODY-COMPOSITION, WEIGHT-LOSS, ENERGY RESTRICTION, EXERCISE, STRENGTH

Downloads

  • 2024 Van Vossel evidence for simultaneous muscle atrophy and hypertrophy.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.61 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van Vossel, Kim, et al. “Evidence for Simultaneous Muscle Atrophy and Hypertrophy in Response to Resistance Training in Humans.” MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, vol. 56, no. 9, 2024, pp. 1634–43, doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000003475.
APA
Van Vossel, K., Hardeel, J., Van der Stede, T., Cools, T., Vandecauter, J., Vanhaecke, L., … Derave, W. (2024). Evidence for simultaneous muscle atrophy and hypertrophy in response to resistance training in humans. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 56(9), 1634–1643. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003475
Chicago author-date
Van Vossel, Kim, Julie Hardeel, Thibaux Van der Stede, Tom Cools, Jonas Vandecauter, Lynn Vanhaecke, Jan Boone, Silvia Salinas Blemker, Eline Lievens, and Wim Derave. 2024. “Evidence for Simultaneous Muscle Atrophy and Hypertrophy in Response to Resistance Training in Humans.” MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE 56 (9): 1634–43. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003475.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van Vossel, Kim, Julie Hardeel, Thibaux Van der Stede, Tom Cools, Jonas Vandecauter, Lynn Vanhaecke, Jan Boone, Silvia Salinas Blemker, Eline Lievens, and Wim Derave. 2024. “Evidence for Simultaneous Muscle Atrophy and Hypertrophy in Response to Resistance Training in Humans.” MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE 56 (9): 1634–1643. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000003475.
Vancouver
1.
Van Vossel K, Hardeel J, Van der Stede T, Cools T, Vandecauter J, Vanhaecke L, et al. Evidence for simultaneous muscle atrophy and hypertrophy in response to resistance training in humans. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE. 2024;56(9):1634–43.
IEEE
[1]
K. Van Vossel et al., “Evidence for simultaneous muscle atrophy and hypertrophy in response to resistance training in humans,” MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1634–1643, 2024.
@article{01J17HSE106AFA0FF8AA930G4C,
  abstract     = {{Purpose: Human skeletal muscle has the profound ability to hypertrophy in response to resistance training (RT). Yet, this has a high energy and protein cost and is presumably mainly restricted to recruited muscles. It remains largely unknown what happens with non-recruited muscles during RT. This study investigated the volume changes of 17 recruited and 13 non-recruited muscles during a 10-week single-joint RT program targeting upper arm and upper leg musculature.

Methods: Muscle volume changes were measured by manual or automatic 3D segmentation in 21 RT novices. Subjects ate ad libitum during the study and energy and protein intake were assessed by self-reported diaries.

Results: Post-training, all recruited muscles increased in volume (range: +2.2% to +17.7%, p < 0.05) while the non-recruited adductor magnus (mean: -1.5 ± 3.1%, p = 0.038) and soleus (-2.4 ± 2.3%, p = 0.0004) decreased in volume. Net muscle growth (r = 0.453, p = 0.045) and changes in adductor magnus volume (r = 0.450, p = 0.047) were positively associated with protein intake. Changes in total non-recruited muscle volume (r = 0.469, p = 0.037), adductor magnus (r = 0.640, p = 0.002), adductor longus (r = 0.465, p = 0.039) and soleus muscle volume (r = 0.481, p = 0.032) were positively related to energy intake (p < 0.05). When subjects were divided into a HIGH or LOW energy intake group, overall non-recruited muscle volume (-1.7 ± 2.0%), adductor longus (-5.6 ± 3.7%), adductor magnus (-2.8 ± 2.4%) and soleus volume (-3.7 ± 1.8%) decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in the LOW but not the HIGH group.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study documenting that some non-recruited muscles significantly atrophy during a period of resistance training. Our data therefore suggest muscle mass reallocation, i.e., that hypertrophy in recruited muscles takes place at the expense of atrophy in non-recruited muscles, especially when energy and protein availability are limited.}},
  author       = {{Van Vossel, Kim and Hardeel, Julie and Van der Stede, Thibaux and Cools, Tom and Vandecauter, Jonas and Vanhaecke, Lynn and Boone, Jan and Blemker, Silvia Salinas and Lievens, Eline and Derave, Wim}},
  issn         = {{0195-9131}},
  journal      = {{MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE}},
  keywords     = {{RESISTANCE TRAINING,ATROPHY,HYPERTROPHY,NON-RECRUITED MUSCLES,RECRUITED MUSCLES,ENERGY INTAKE,PROTEIN INTAKE,RESTING METABOLIC-RATE,LOWER-LIMB MUSCLES,LEAN MASS GAIN,FAT-FREE MASS,PROTEIN-SYNTHESIS,BODY-COMPOSITION,WEIGHT-LOSS,ENERGY RESTRICTION,EXERCISE,STRENGTH}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{9}},
  pages        = {{1634--1643}},
  title        = {{Evidence for simultaneous muscle atrophy and hypertrophy in response to resistance training in humans}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003475}},
  volume       = {{56}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: