Patient versus person centeredness : embracing different perspectives
- Author
- Ellen Pipers, Melissa De Regge (UGent) , Jochen Bergs, Sara Leroi-Werelds, Katrien Verleye (UGent) and Sandra Streukens
- Organization
- Abstract
- PurposeThe aim of this study is twofold: (1) to gain insight into the different perspectives on the relationship between patient and person centeredness and (2) to learn more about the differences between non-academic and academic stakeholders in the healthcare system.Design/methodology/approachThis mixed-methods study includes a scoping review on person and patient centeredness and in-depth interviews with patients, caregivers, staff and management of healthcare organizations. The data were analyzed by following the six phases of Braun and Clarke.FindingsThe analysis of the data showed four different perspectives on patient versus person centeredness: (1) they are synonyms; (2) one term is favorite; (3) they should be in balance; and (4) person centeredness is the surplus on top of patient centeredness.Research limitations/implicationsThere are different perspectives on patient versus person centeredness. Perspectives differ between people and can change over time. Some people feel like a patient all the time, other people feel like a person all the time, and some feel like a patient at one point in time and as a person at another point in time.Practical implicationsThese different perspectives can have important implications for the so-called moments of truth. In their role as patients, people value functional encounters and in their identity as people they value meaningful encounters with caregivers.Originality/valueBy unraveling these different perspectives, novel insights were found in the different perspectives people can take.
- Keywords
- Person centeredness, Patient centeredness, Perspectives, Scoping review, In-depth interviews, CARE
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.02 MB
-
Pipers E et al Accepted Manuscript.docx
- full text (Accepted manuscript)
- |
- open access
- |
- Word
- |
- 4.22 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01HYWNKRPVD6P9C97PJ7ZXJZWM
- MLA
- Pipers, Ellen, et al. “Patient versus Person Centeredness : Embracing Different Perspectives.” JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 38, no. 3, 2024, pp. 430–46, doi:10.1108/jhom-09-2023-0289.
- APA
- Pipers, E., De Regge, M., Bergs, J., Leroi-Werelds, S., Verleye, K., & Streukens, S. (2024). Patient versus person centeredness : embracing different perspectives. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 38(3), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhom-09-2023-0289
- Chicago author-date
- Pipers, Ellen, Melissa De Regge, Jochen Bergs, Sara Leroi-Werelds, Katrien Verleye, and Sandra Streukens. 2024. “Patient versus Person Centeredness : Embracing Different Perspectives.” JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 38 (3): 430–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhom-09-2023-0289.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Pipers, Ellen, Melissa De Regge, Jochen Bergs, Sara Leroi-Werelds, Katrien Verleye, and Sandra Streukens. 2024. “Patient versus Person Centeredness : Embracing Different Perspectives.” JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 38 (3): 430–446. doi:10.1108/jhom-09-2023-0289.
- Vancouver
- 1.Pipers E, De Regge M, Bergs J, Leroi-Werelds S, Verleye K, Streukens S. Patient versus person centeredness : embracing different perspectives. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT. 2024;38(3):430–46.
- IEEE
- [1]E. Pipers, M. De Regge, J. Bergs, S. Leroi-Werelds, K. Verleye, and S. Streukens, “Patient versus person centeredness : embracing different perspectives,” JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 430–446, 2024.
@article{01HYWNKRPVD6P9C97PJ7ZXJZWM,
abstract = {{PurposeThe aim of this study is twofold: (1) to gain insight into the different perspectives on the relationship between patient and person centeredness and (2) to learn more about the differences between non-academic and academic stakeholders in the healthcare system.Design/methodology/approachThis mixed-methods study includes a scoping review on person and patient centeredness and in-depth interviews with patients, caregivers, staff and management of healthcare organizations. The data were analyzed by following the six phases of Braun and Clarke.FindingsThe analysis of the data showed four different perspectives on patient versus person centeredness: (1) they are synonyms; (2) one term is favorite; (3) they should be in balance; and (4) person centeredness is the surplus on top of patient centeredness.Research limitations/implicationsThere are different perspectives on patient versus person centeredness. Perspectives differ between people and can change over time. Some people feel like a patient all the time, other people feel like a person all the time, and some feel like a patient at one point in time and as a person at another point in time.Practical implicationsThese different perspectives can have important implications for the so-called moments of truth. In their role as patients, people value functional encounters and in their identity as people they value meaningful encounters with caregivers.Originality/valueBy unraveling these different perspectives, novel insights were found in the different perspectives people can take.}},
author = {{Pipers, Ellen and De Regge, Melissa and Bergs, Jochen and Leroi-Werelds, Sara and Verleye, Katrien and Streukens, Sandra}},
issn = {{1477-7266}},
journal = {{JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT}},
keywords = {{Person centeredness,Patient centeredness,Perspectives,Scoping review,In-depth interviews,CARE}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{3}},
pages = {{430--446}},
title = {{Patient versus person centeredness : embracing different perspectives}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1108/jhom-09-2023-0289}},
volume = {{38}},
year = {{2024}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: