@article{01HYFX505Z70XZS9XHASK4ZQ53,
  abstract     = {{Background and aims: Plant breeders are increasingly turning to crop wild relatives (CWRs) to ensure food security in a rapidly changing environment. However, CWR populations are confronted with various human-induced threats, including hybridization with their nearby cultivated crops. This might be a particular problem for wild coffee species, which often occur near coffee cultivation areas. Here, we briefly review the evidence for wild Coffea arabica (cultivated as Arabica coffee) and Coffea canephora (cultivated as Robusta coffee) and then focused on C. canephora in the Yangambi region in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. There, we examined the geographical distribution of cultivated C. canephora and the incidence of hybridization between cultivated and wild individuals within the rainforest.

Methods: We collected 71 C. canephora individuals from home gardens and 12 C. canephora individuals from the tropical rainforest in the Yangambi region and genotyped them using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). We compared the fingerprints with existing GBS data from 388 C. canephora individuals from natural tropical rainforests and the INERA Coffee Collection, a Robusta coffee field gene bank and the most probable source of cultivated genotypes in the area. We then established robust diagnostic fingerprints that genetically differentiate cultivated from wild coffee, identified cultivated-wild hybrids and mapped their geographical position in the rainforest.

Key results: We identified cultivated genotypes and cultivated-wild hybrids in zones with clear anthropogenic activity, and where cultivated C. canephora in home gardens may serve as a source for crop-to-wild gene flow. We found relatively few hybrids and backcrosses in the rainforests.

Conclusions: The cultivation of C. canephora in close proximity to its wild gene pool has led to cultivated genotypes and cultivated-wild hybrids appearing within the natural habitats of C. canephora. Yet, given the high genetic similarity between the cultivated and wild gene pool, together with the relatively low incidence of hybridization, our results indicate that the overall impact in terms of risk of introgression remains limited so far.}},
  author       = {{Verleysen, Lauren and Depecker, Jonas and Bollen, Robrecht and Asimonyio, Justin and Hatangi, Yves and Kambale, Jean-Léon and Mwanga Mwanga, Ithe and Ebele, Thsimi and Dhed'a, Benoit and Stoffelen, Piet and Ruttink, Tom and Vandelook, Filip and Honnay, Olivier}},
  issn         = {{0305-7364}},
  journal      = {{ANNALS OF BOTANY}},
  keywords     = {{Coffea canephora,Congo Basin,Robusta coffee,crop wild relatives (CWRs),cultivated–wild hybridization,field gene bank,gene flow,introgression,INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION,POPULATION-STRUCTURE,DIVERSITY,CONSERVATION,RUBIACEAE,RELATIVES,PLANTS,DIFFERENTIATION,INTROGRESSION,RESISTANCE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{7}},
  pages        = {{917--930}},
  title        = {{Crop-to-wild gene flow in wild coffee species : the case of Coffea canephora in the Democratic Republic of the Congo}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae034}},
  volume       = {{133}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: