Advanced search
2 files | 1.11 MB Add to list

Revisiting the role of social work in the substantial realization of social rights in local welfare systems : transforming and changing the rules of the institutional game?

(2024) SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION. 58(7). p.1187-1201
Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Although diverse European welfare states have institutionalized an extensive infrastructure of public welfare services to redistribute resources, governments have been confronted with barriers in realizing the social rights of certain groups of citizens. Decentralization and increasingly local welfare provision has been promoted as a strategy to substantially realize social rights. In that sense, the vital role of frontline social work has been stressed in local welfare systems, being considered as dynamic arrangements in which local policymakers and professional social work actors are involved in the substantial realization of social rights. These trends have been frequently studied from a social policy perspective, but the role of professional social work on the frontline level has received much less attention. In this study, we accordingly rely on neo-institutional theory to explore how frontline social workers employ their professional discretion during processes of local social policy implementation, related to the broader circumstances in which they operate. Our qualitative study aims to tease out whether their strategic actions might transform and/or change the rules of the local institutional game. The qualitative analysis is based on policy documents and qualitative interviews with key actors in two municipalities in Belgium. Our research findings reveal three central fields of tension: (1) Rescaling of responsibilities to the local welfare system and community level versus in-built spatial concentrations of social problems and inequalities, (2) Efficient local welfare system organization versus wicked social problems, and (3) Fast local welfare system logics versus slow realities.
Keywords
STREET-LEVEL, POLICY, RESISTANCE, GOVERNANCE, DISCRETION, ACTORS, CARE, discretion, local welfare systems, neo-institutional theory, social rights, social work

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.01 MB
  • Accepted Manuscript - Revisiting the role of social work in the substantial realisation of social rights in local welfare systems.docx
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • Word
    • |
    • 98.76 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Dewanckel, Lore, et al. “Revisiting the Role of Social Work in the Substantial Realization of Social Rights in Local Welfare Systems : Transforming and Changing the Rules of the Institutional Game?” SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, vol. 58, no. 7, 2024, pp. 1187–201, doi:10.1111/spol.13022.
APA
Dewanckel, L., Schiettecat, T., Hermans, K., Roose, R., Van Lancker, W., Kessl, F., & Roets, G. (2024). Revisiting the role of social work in the substantial realization of social rights in local welfare systems : transforming and changing the rules of the institutional game? SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 58(7), 1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13022
Chicago author-date
Dewanckel, Lore, Tineke Schiettecat, Koen Hermans, Rudi Roose, Wim Van Lancker, Fabian Kessl, and Griet Roets. 2024. “Revisiting the Role of Social Work in the Substantial Realization of Social Rights in Local Welfare Systems : Transforming and Changing the Rules of the Institutional Game?” SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION 58 (7): 1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13022.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Dewanckel, Lore, Tineke Schiettecat, Koen Hermans, Rudi Roose, Wim Van Lancker, Fabian Kessl, and Griet Roets. 2024. “Revisiting the Role of Social Work in the Substantial Realization of Social Rights in Local Welfare Systems : Transforming and Changing the Rules of the Institutional Game?” SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION 58 (7): 1187–1201. doi:10.1111/spol.13022.
Vancouver
1.
Dewanckel L, Schiettecat T, Hermans K, Roose R, Van Lancker W, Kessl F, et al. Revisiting the role of social work in the substantial realization of social rights in local welfare systems : transforming and changing the rules of the institutional game? SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION. 2024;58(7):1187–201.
IEEE
[1]
L. Dewanckel et al., “Revisiting the role of social work in the substantial realization of social rights in local welfare systems : transforming and changing the rules of the institutional game?,” SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1187–1201, 2024.
@article{01HYDQQAWXHVXM0MCZKSQNW1MJ,
  abstract     = {{Although diverse European welfare states have institutionalized an extensive infrastructure of public welfare services to redistribute resources, governments have been confronted with barriers in realizing the social rights of certain groups of citizens. Decentralization and increasingly local welfare provision has been promoted as a strategy to substantially realize social rights. In that sense, the vital role of frontline social work has been stressed in local welfare systems, being considered as dynamic arrangements in which local policymakers and professional social work actors are involved in the substantial realization of social rights. These trends have been frequently studied from a social policy perspective, but the role of professional social work on the frontline level has received much less attention. In this study, we accordingly rely on neo-institutional theory to explore how frontline social workers employ their professional discretion during processes of local social policy implementation, related to the broader circumstances in which they operate. Our qualitative study aims to tease out whether their strategic actions might transform and/or change the rules of the local institutional game. The qualitative analysis is based on policy documents and qualitative interviews with key actors in two municipalities in Belgium. Our research findings reveal three central fields of tension: (1) Rescaling of responsibilities to the local welfare system and community level versus in-built spatial concentrations of social problems and inequalities, (2) Efficient local welfare system organization versus wicked social problems, and (3) Fast local welfare system logics versus slow realities.}},
  author       = {{Dewanckel, Lore and Schiettecat, Tineke and  Hermans, Koen and Roose, Rudi and  Van Lancker, Wim and  Kessl, Fabian and Roets, Griet}},
  issn         = {{0144-5596}},
  journal      = {{SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION}},
  keywords     = {{STREET-LEVEL,POLICY,RESISTANCE,GOVERNANCE,DISCRETION,ACTORS,CARE,discretion,local welfare systems,neo-institutional theory,social rights,social work}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{7}},
  pages        = {{1187--1201}},
  title        = {{Revisiting the role of social work in the substantial realization of social rights in local welfare systems : transforming and changing the rules of the institutional game?}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13022}},
  volume       = {{58}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: