@article{01HWQ5Q6F8KFP763QENF4M73E5,
  abstract     = {{Purpose: Emerging technologies are addressing current challenges to shift from a linear to a circular economy. However, the consideration of social aspects in this context is limited, and the prioritization of indicators appears arbitrary in the absence of clear and robust selection criteria. Following social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) principles, the aim of this paper is to guide the selection and inventory of social indicators based on a case study on evolving flexible packaging within the European circular economy.
Methods: To achieve the objective, the study involves several steps, including conducting a systematic literature review to identify key stakeholders, impact subcategories, indicators, and inventories for circular flexible plastic packaging. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is applied to preselect a set of indicators, followed by stakeholder engagement in prioritizing impact indicators through participatory methods. Subsequently, a data collection procedure was established.
Results and discussion: This paper presents a materiality ranking for 19 social indicators tailored to the emerging circular flexible packaging. The result is a prioritization of nine of these indicators, including Existence of record of proof of age, Percentage of workers who are paid a living wage or above, and Existence of certified environmental management system. These nine indicators form the basis for the collection of respective inventory data for an entry-level assessment. Furthermore, guidelines on 11 procedural steps were formulated based on these findings. Moreover, challenges of synonymity and inconsistency in S-LCA terminology, besides inaccessible inventory data especially in the context of evolving recycling technologies, are identified as substantial barriers in the effort to streamline and perform S-LCA.
Conclusions: The paper concludes that prioritizing indicators is essential for entry-level and prospective assessments, especially when time and data are limited. Additionally, using primary inventory data to evaluate the foreground system and its direct impacts on stakeholders promotes accountability and corporate social responsibility. Furthermore, a set of procedural steps, from defining the system boundary to preparing the data questionnaire, serves as a valuable resource for practitioners across diverse industries.
Recommendations: In future research, these nine prioritized indicators can be applied to assess the social performance of various case studies along the value chain of circular flexible plastic packaging, covering food and non-food applications. In addition, the methodological guidelines for selecting and prioritizing indicators can be replicated across multiple industry sectors. Moreover, research effort should be directed towards establishing a methodological framework for prospective S-LCA in the context of emerging technologies.}},
  author       = {{Haslinger, Anna-Sophie and Huysveld, Sophie and Cadena Martinez, Erasmo and Dewulf, Jo}},
  editor       = {{Traverso, Marzia and Nangah Mankaa, Rose}},
  issn         = {{0948-3349}},
  journal      = {{INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT}},
  keywords     = {{Social life cycle assessment,Social indicators,Social inventory data,Flexible plastic packaging,Circular economy,Materiality assessment,Stakeholder participation,NUMBER 7,SUSTAINABILITY,PERFORMANCE,METHODOLOGY,SYSTEMS,PLUS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1397--1414}},
  title        = {{Guidelines on the selection and inventory of social life cycle assessment indicators : a case study on flexible plastic packaging in the European circular economy}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02312-y}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: