@article{01HWM6WGCXQ8VX823FDNZQMFXD,
  abstract     = {{Purpose: When resources are extracted and used by society, they are not necessarily lost for future generations. Therefore, recent publications on impact assessment of abiotic resource use in life cycle assessment focus on a decreased accessibility of resources due to dissipation, rather than depletion. In a previous study, dissipation was defined as a function of the global change in accessible stock due to human actions, and the global amount of the accessible stock, assuming a very long-term time perspective (more than 500 years). In this paper, a short-term time perspective (25 years) is adopted.
Methods: The same generic characterization model is used, but different choices are outlined to derive characterization factors for a short-term perspective (25 years). To illustrate how the short term might be approached, a preliminary set of characterization factors is developed, based on assumptions and estimates.
Results: The problem of resource use is defined as follows: the decrease of accessibility on a global level of primary and/or secondary elements over the short term due to the net result of compromising actions (i.e., emissions, dissipation in the technosphere, occupation in use, and exploration for new stocks). Characterization factors are derived based on assumptions, like the following: the accessible stock is based on present estimates of accessible stocks in the environment and the technosphere; estimates of accessible stocks in the technosphere are based on past extractions and generic recycling rates; all flows that are presently not recycled are assumed to be inaccessible. Finally, weighting between elements and the functions they have for the present society is based on the added value of the economic sector that is affected due to the decreased accessibility.
Discussion and conclusion: A preliminary set of characterization factors is proposed for 55 elements. They assess the impact of the present use of resources on the decreased accessibility in the short term due to emissions and dissipation in the technosphere. However, calculation of impact category scores is still hampered by a lack of appropriate data for dissipative flows in life cycle inventory databases. The presented calculations are based on several simplifications and proxies. A more detailed distinction of dissipative flows and estimates of stocks in the technosphere may be possible based on (dynamic) SFA modelling of elements in different applications. To derive a more mature set of characterization factors, it is recommended to use the presented model as a basis and further elaborate or replace the proxies.}},
  author       = {{van Oers, Lauran and Guinée, Jeroen B. and Heijungs, Reinout and Schulze, Rita and Alvarenga, Rodrigo A. F. and Dewulf, Jo and Drielsma, Johannes}},
  issn         = {{0948-3349}},
  journal      = {{INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT}},
  keywords     = {{Abiotic resources,Elements,Minerals,Metals,Life cycle impact assessment,System model,Characterization model,Characterization factor,Dissipation,Short term,IMPACT ASSESSMENT,METHODOLOGY}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{7}},
  pages        = {{1315--1338}},
  title        = {{Top-down characterization of resource use in LCA : from problem definition of resource use to operational characterization factors for resource inaccessibility of elements in a short-term time perspective}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02297-8}},
  volume       = {{29}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: