
The efficacy and safety of metastasis-directed therapy in patients with prostate cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
- Author
- Marcin Miszczyk, Pawel Rajwa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Zuzanna Nowicka, Sung Ryul Shim, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Tatsushi Kawada, Markus von Deimling, Benjamin Pradere, Juan Gomez Rivas, Giorgio Gandaglia, Roderick C. N. van den Bergh, Gregor Goldner, Stephane Supiot, Thomas Zilli, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Paul L. Nguyen, Alberto Briganti, Piet Ost (UGent) , Guillaume Ploussard and Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Organization
- Abstract
- Context: Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis -directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well -designed prospective studies. Objective: To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients. Evidence acquisition: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression -free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/ or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta -analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta -regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators. Evidence synthesis: We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta -analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33-52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94-98%), 55% (95% CI: 44- 65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95-98%), respectively. Rates of treatment -related grade 2 and >= 3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2-7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. Conclusions: MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone -sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain. Patient summary: Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable toxicity. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).
- Keywords
- Metastasectomy, Radiation therapy, Oligometastatic, Prostate cancer, Metastasis-directed therapy
Downloads
-
published version.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 810.08 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01HS88HFW017PXTH2N2C5B622D
- MLA
- Miszczyk, Marcin, et al. “The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.” EUROPEAN UROLOGY, vol. 85, no. 2, 2024, pp. 125–38, doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012.
- APA
- Miszczyk, M., Rajwa, P., Yanagisawa, T., Nowicka, Z., Shim, S. R., Laukhtina, E., … Shariat, S. F. (2024). The efficacy and safety of metastasis-directed therapy in patients with prostate cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 85(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012
- Chicago author-date
- Miszczyk, Marcin, Pawel Rajwa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Zuzanna Nowicka, Sung Ryul Shim, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Tatsushi Kawada, et al. 2024. “The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.” EUROPEAN UROLOGY 85 (2): 125–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Miszczyk, Marcin, Pawel Rajwa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Zuzanna Nowicka, Sung Ryul Shim, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Tatsushi Kawada, Markus von Deimling, Benjamin Pradere, Juan Gomez Rivas, Giorgio Gandaglia, Roderick C. N. van den Bergh, Gregor Goldner, Stephane Supiot, Thomas Zilli, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Paul L. Nguyen, Alberto Briganti, Piet Ost, Guillaume Ploussard, and Shahrokh F. Shariat. 2024. “The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.” EUROPEAN UROLOGY 85 (2): 125–138. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012.
- Vancouver
- 1.Miszczyk M, Rajwa P, Yanagisawa T, Nowicka Z, Shim SR, Laukhtina E, et al. The efficacy and safety of metastasis-directed therapy in patients with prostate cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. EUROPEAN UROLOGY. 2024;85(2):125–38.
- IEEE
- [1]M. Miszczyk et al., “The efficacy and safety of metastasis-directed therapy in patients with prostate cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies,” EUROPEAN UROLOGY, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 125–138, 2024.
@article{01HS88HFW017PXTH2N2C5B622D, abstract = {{Context: Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis -directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well -designed prospective studies. Objective: To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients. Evidence acquisition: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression -free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/ or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta -analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta -regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators. Evidence synthesis: We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta -analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33-52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94-98%), 55% (95% CI: 44- 65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95-98%), respectively. Rates of treatment -related grade 2 and >= 3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2-7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. Conclusions: MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone -sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain. Patient summary: Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable toxicity. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).}}, author = {{Miszczyk, Marcin and Rajwa, Pawel and Yanagisawa, Takafumi and Nowicka, Zuzanna and Shim, Sung Ryul and Laukhtina, Ekaterina and Kawada, Tatsushi and von Deimling, Markus and Pradere, Benjamin and Rivas, Juan Gomez and Gandaglia, Giorgio and van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. and Goldner, Gregor and Supiot, Stephane and Zilli, Thomas and Trinh, Quoc-Dien and Nguyen, Paul L. and Briganti, Alberto and Ost, Piet and Ploussard, Guillaume and Shariat, Shahrokh F.}}, issn = {{0302-2838}}, journal = {{EUROPEAN UROLOGY}}, keywords = {{Metastasectomy,Radiation therapy,Oligometastatic,Prostate cancer,Metastasis-directed therapy}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{125--138}}, title = {{The efficacy and safety of metastasis-directed therapy in patients with prostate cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012}}, volume = {{85}}, year = {{2024}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: