Settler colonialism and therapeutic discourses on the past : a response to Burnett et al.’s ‘a politics of reminding’
- Author
- Rafaël Verbuyst (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- In 'A politics of reminding: Khoisan resurgence and environmental justice in South Africa's Sarah Baartman district', Burnett et al. scrutinize the memory activism of the Gamtkwa Khoisan Council, which is part of the wider 'Khoisan resurgence' sweeping across post-apartheid South Africa. Although the authors missed important nuances, they also pointed out flaws in the way I used Niezen's 'therapeutic history' [Niezen, R. (2009). The rediscovered self: Indigenous identity and cultural justice. McGill-Queen's Press] in my work to account for why Khoisan activists turn to the past. I therefore not only respond to their criticism, but also revise aspects of my theoretical framework. Therapeutic history is not divorced from material concerns. Nor is it representative of all engagements with the past by indigenous people or simply the opposite of academic history. Instead, by drawing on my ethnographic fieldwork and theorizing alongside the Khoisan, I show how it captures emic discourses on the past that entangle notions of indigenous identity, healing, and history in order to resist settler colonialism and its oppressive etic histories. While the concept of therapeutic history has its limitations, it effectively highlights indigenous people's agency in the face of settler colonialism in South Africa and elsewhere.
- Keywords
- General Social Sciences, Khoisan activism, settler colonialism, etic history, emic history, Therapeutic history
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.58 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01HRYR579GEHP4ZENQGY3VVZD8
- MLA
- Verbuyst, Rafaël. “Settler Colonialism and Therapeutic Discourses on the Past : A Response to Burnett et al.’s ‘a Politics of Reminding.’” CRITICAL DISCOURSE STUDIES, vol. 22, no. 1, 2025, pp. 53–69, doi:10.1080/17405904.2023.2273324.
- APA
- Verbuyst, R. (2025). Settler colonialism and therapeutic discourses on the past : a response to Burnett et al.’s “a politics of reminding.” CRITICAL DISCOURSE STUDIES, 22(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2273324
- Chicago author-date
- Verbuyst, Rafaël. 2025. “Settler Colonialism and Therapeutic Discourses on the Past : A Response to Burnett et al.’s ‘a Politics of Reminding.’” CRITICAL DISCOURSE STUDIES 22 (1): 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2273324.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Verbuyst, Rafaël. 2025. “Settler Colonialism and Therapeutic Discourses on the Past : A Response to Burnett et al.’s ‘a Politics of Reminding.’” CRITICAL DISCOURSE STUDIES 22 (1): 53–69. doi:10.1080/17405904.2023.2273324.
- Vancouver
- 1.Verbuyst R. Settler colonialism and therapeutic discourses on the past : a response to Burnett et al.’s “a politics of reminding.” CRITICAL DISCOURSE STUDIES. 2025;22(1):53–69.
- IEEE
- [1]R. Verbuyst, “Settler colonialism and therapeutic discourses on the past : a response to Burnett et al.’s ‘a politics of reminding,’” CRITICAL DISCOURSE STUDIES, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 53–69, 2025.
@article{01HRYR579GEHP4ZENQGY3VVZD8,
abstract = {{In 'A politics of reminding: Khoisan resurgence and environmental justice in South Africa's Sarah Baartman district', Burnett et al. scrutinize the memory activism of the Gamtkwa Khoisan Council, which is part of the wider 'Khoisan resurgence' sweeping across post-apartheid South Africa. Although the authors missed important nuances, they also pointed out flaws in the way I used Niezen's 'therapeutic history' [Niezen, R. (2009). The rediscovered self: Indigenous identity and cultural justice. McGill-Queen's Press] in my work to account for why Khoisan activists turn to the past. I therefore not only respond to their criticism, but also revise aspects of my theoretical framework. Therapeutic history is not divorced from material concerns. Nor is it representative of all engagements with the past by indigenous people or simply the opposite of academic history. Instead, by drawing on my ethnographic fieldwork and theorizing alongside the Khoisan, I show how it captures emic discourses on the past that entangle notions of indigenous identity, healing, and history in order to resist settler colonialism and its oppressive etic histories. While the concept of therapeutic history has its limitations, it effectively highlights indigenous people's agency in the face of settler colonialism in South Africa and elsewhere.}},
author = {{Verbuyst, Rafaël}},
issn = {{1740-5904}},
journal = {{CRITICAL DISCOURSE STUDIES}},
keywords = {{General Social Sciences,Khoisan activism,settler colonialism,etic history,emic history,Therapeutic history}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{53--69}},
title = {{Settler colonialism and therapeutic discourses on the past : a response to Burnett et al.’s ‘a politics of reminding’}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2273324}},
volume = {{22}},
year = {{2025}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: