
Manual versus deep learning measurements to evaluate cumulus expansion of bovine oocytes and its relationship with embryo development in vitro
- Author
- Annelies Raes (UGent) , Georgios Athanasiou, Nima AzariDolatabad, Hafez Sadeghi, Dario Sebastian Gonzalez Andueza, Josep Lluis Arcos, Jesus Cerquides, Krishna Chaitanya Pavani (UGent) , Geert Opsomer (UGent) , Osvaldo Américo Bogado Pascottini (UGent) , Katrien Smits (UGent) , Daniel Angel Velez (UGent) and Ann Van Soom (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- Cumulus expansion is an important indicator of oocyte maturation and has been suggested to be indicative of greater oocyte developmental capacity. Although multiple methods have been described to assess cumulus expansion, none of them is considered a gold standard. Additionally, these methods are subjective and timeconsuming. In this manuscript, the reliability of three cumulus expansion measurement methods was assessed, and a deep learning model was created to automatically perform the measurement. Cumulus expansion of 232 cumulus-oocyte complexes was evaluated by three independent observers using three methods: (1) measurement of the cumulus area, (2) measurement of three distances between the zona pellucida and outer cumulus, and (3) scoring cumulus expansion on a 5-point Likert scale. The reliability of the methods was calculated in terms of intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICC) for both inter- and intra-observer agreements. The area method resulted in the best overall inter-observer agreement with an ICC of 0.89 versus 0.54 and 0.30 for the 3-distance and scoring methods, respectively. Therefore, the area method served as the base to create a deep learning model, AIxpansion, which reaches a human-level performance in terms of average rank, bias and variance. To evaluate the accuracy of the methods, the results of cumulus expansion calculations were linked to embryonic development. Cumulus expansion had increased significantly in oocytes that achieved successful embryo development when measured by AI-xpansion, the area- or 3-distance method, while this was not the case for the scoring method. Measuring the area is the most reliable method to manually evaluate cumulus expansion, whilst deep learning automatically performs the calculation with human-level precision and high accuracy and could therefore be a valuable prospective tool for embryologists.
- Keywords
- EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR, FOLLICULAR-FLUID, MOUSE OOCYTES, MATURATION, EXPRESSION, COMPLEXES, QUALITY, SPERM, SERUM, ACIDS, Cumulus expansion, Image segmentation, In vitro embryo production
Downloads
-
Manual versus deep learning AVS ICBM 2024.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 3.60 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01HRSD0638415T8F0M6F42MP39
- MLA
- Raes, Annelies, et al. “Manual versus Deep Learning Measurements to Evaluate Cumulus Expansion of Bovine Oocytes and Its Relationship with Embryo Development in Vitro.” COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, vol. 168, Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, 2024, doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107785.
- APA
- Raes, A., Athanasiou, G., AzariDolatabad, N., Sadeghi, H., Gonzalez Andueza, D. S., Arcos, J. L., … Van Soom, A. (2024). Manual versus deep learning measurements to evaluate cumulus expansion of bovine oocytes and its relationship with embryo development in vitro. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107785
- Chicago author-date
- Raes, Annelies, Georgios Athanasiou, Nima AzariDolatabad, Hafez Sadeghi, Dario Sebastian Gonzalez Andueza, Josep Lluis Arcos, Jesus Cerquides, et al. 2024. “Manual versus Deep Learning Measurements to Evaluate Cumulus Expansion of Bovine Oocytes and Its Relationship with Embryo Development in Vitro.” COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107785.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Raes, Annelies, Georgios Athanasiou, Nima AzariDolatabad, Hafez Sadeghi, Dario Sebastian Gonzalez Andueza, Josep Lluis Arcos, Jesus Cerquides, Krishna Chaitanya Pavani, Geert Opsomer, Osvaldo Américo Bogado Pascottini, Katrien Smits, Daniel Angel Velez, and Ann Van Soom. 2024. “Manual versus Deep Learning Measurements to Evaluate Cumulus Expansion of Bovine Oocytes and Its Relationship with Embryo Development in Vitro.” COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 168. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107785.
- Vancouver
- 1.Raes A, Athanasiou G, AzariDolatabad N, Sadeghi H, Gonzalez Andueza DS, Arcos JL, et al. Manual versus deep learning measurements to evaluate cumulus expansion of bovine oocytes and its relationship with embryo development in vitro. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE. 2024;168.
- IEEE
- [1]A. Raes et al., “Manual versus deep learning measurements to evaluate cumulus expansion of bovine oocytes and its relationship with embryo development in vitro,” COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, vol. 168, 2024.
@article{01HRSD0638415T8F0M6F42MP39, abstract = {{Cumulus expansion is an important indicator of oocyte maturation and has been suggested to be indicative of greater oocyte developmental capacity. Although multiple methods have been described to assess cumulus expansion, none of them is considered a gold standard. Additionally, these methods are subjective and timeconsuming. In this manuscript, the reliability of three cumulus expansion measurement methods was assessed, and a deep learning model was created to automatically perform the measurement. Cumulus expansion of 232 cumulus-oocyte complexes was evaluated by three independent observers using three methods: (1) measurement of the cumulus area, (2) measurement of three distances between the zona pellucida and outer cumulus, and (3) scoring cumulus expansion on a 5-point Likert scale. The reliability of the methods was calculated in terms of intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICC) for both inter- and intra-observer agreements. The area method resulted in the best overall inter-observer agreement with an ICC of 0.89 versus 0.54 and 0.30 for the 3-distance and scoring methods, respectively. Therefore, the area method served as the base to create a deep learning model, AIxpansion, which reaches a human-level performance in terms of average rank, bias and variance. To evaluate the accuracy of the methods, the results of cumulus expansion calculations were linked to embryonic development. Cumulus expansion had increased significantly in oocytes that achieved successful embryo development when measured by AI-xpansion, the area- or 3-distance method, while this was not the case for the scoring method. Measuring the area is the most reliable method to manually evaluate cumulus expansion, whilst deep learning automatically performs the calculation with human-level precision and high accuracy and could therefore be a valuable prospective tool for embryologists.}}, articleno = {{107785}}, author = {{Raes, Annelies and Athanasiou, Georgios and AzariDolatabad, Nima and Sadeghi, Hafez and Gonzalez Andueza, Dario Sebastian and Arcos, Josep Lluis and Cerquides, Jesus and Pavani, Krishna Chaitanya and Opsomer, Geert and Bogado Pascottini, Osvaldo Américo and Smits, Katrien and Angel Velez, Daniel and Van Soom, Ann}}, issn = {{0010-4825}}, journal = {{COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE}}, keywords = {{EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR,FOLLICULAR-FLUID,MOUSE OOCYTES,MATURATION,EXPRESSION,COMPLEXES,QUALITY,SPERM,SERUM,ACIDS,Cumulus expansion,Image segmentation,In vitro embryo production}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{9}}, publisher = {{Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd}}, title = {{Manual versus deep learning measurements to evaluate cumulus expansion of bovine oocytes and its relationship with embryo development in vitro}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107785}}, volume = {{168}}, year = {{2024}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: