- Author
- Frédérick Dionne, Melanie Fleischhacker, Peter Muntigl (UGent) and Eva-Maria Graf
- Organization
- Abstract
- Introduction: This study investigates clients’ resisting practices when reacting to business coaches’ wh-questions. Neither the sequential organization of questions nor client resistance to questions have yet been (thoroughly) investigated for this helping professional format. Client resistance is understood as a sequentially structured, locally emerging practice that may be accomplished in more passive or active forms, that in some way withdraw from, oppose, withstand or circumvent various interactional constraints (e.g., topical, epistemic, deontic, affective) set up by the coach’s question. Procedure and methods: Drawing on a corpus of systemic, solution-oriented business coaching processes and applying Conversation Analysis (CA), the following research questions are addressed: How do clients display resistance to answering coaches’ wh-questions? How might these resistive actions be positioned along a passive/active, implicit/explicit or withdrawing/opposing continuum? Are certain linguistic/interactional features commonly used to accomplish resistance?. Results and discussion: The analysis of four dyadic coaching processes with a total of eleven sessions found various forms of client resistance on the active-passive continuum, though the more explicit, active, and agentive forms are at the center of our analysis. According to the existing resistance ‘action terminology’ (moving away vs. moving against), moving against or ‘opposing’ included ‘refusing to answer’, ‘complaining’ and ‘disagreeing with the question’s agenda and presuppositions’. However, alongside this, the analysis evinced clients’ refocusing practices to actively (and sometimes productively) transform or deviate the course of action; a category which we have termed moving around.
- Keywords
- business coaching, wh-questioning sequences, resistive actions, clients' resisting, conversation analysis, CONVERSATION ANALYSIS, RESISTANCE, INTERROGATIVES, PROGRESSIVITY, ORGANIZATION, PREFERENCE, DIRECTIVES, RESPONSES, REPAIR, LIFE
Downloads
-
fpsyg-15-1240842.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 8.67 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01HQJ90NEGXJXNNYVSKPAN54WR
- MLA
- Dionne, Frédérick, et al. “Resisting Wh-Questions in Business Coaching.” FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 15, 2024, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1240842.
- APA
- Dionne, F., Fleischhacker, M., Muntigl, P., & Graf, E.-M. (2024). Resisting wh-questions in business coaching. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1240842
- Chicago author-date
- Dionne, Frédérick, Melanie Fleischhacker, Peter Muntigl, and Eva-Maria Graf. 2024. “Resisting Wh-Questions in Business Coaching.” FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1240842.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Dionne, Frédérick, Melanie Fleischhacker, Peter Muntigl, and Eva-Maria Graf. 2024. “Resisting Wh-Questions in Business Coaching.” FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1240842.
- Vancouver
- 1.Dionne F, Fleischhacker M, Muntigl P, Graf E-M. Resisting wh-questions in business coaching. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY. 2024;15.
- IEEE
- [1]F. Dionne, M. Fleischhacker, P. Muntigl, and E.-M. Graf, “Resisting wh-questions in business coaching,” FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 15, 2024.
@article{01HQJ90NEGXJXNNYVSKPAN54WR,
abstract = {{Introduction: This study investigates clients’ resisting practices when reacting to business coaches’ wh-questions. Neither the sequential organization of questions nor client resistance to questions have yet been (thoroughly) investigated for this helping professional format. Client resistance is understood as a sequentially structured, locally emerging practice that may be accomplished in more passive or active forms, that in some way withdraw from, oppose, withstand or circumvent various interactional constraints (e.g., topical, epistemic, deontic, affective) set up by the coach’s question.
Procedure and methods: Drawing on a corpus of systemic, solution-oriented business coaching processes and applying Conversation Analysis (CA), the following research questions are addressed: How do clients display resistance to answering coaches’ wh-questions? How might these resistive actions be positioned along a passive/active, implicit/explicit or withdrawing/opposing continuum? Are certain linguistic/interactional features commonly used to accomplish resistance?.
Results and discussion: The analysis of four dyadic coaching processes with a total of eleven sessions found various forms of client resistance on the active-passive continuum, though the more explicit, active, and agentive forms are at the center of our analysis. According to the existing resistance ‘action terminology’ (moving away vs. moving against), moving against or ‘opposing’ included ‘refusing to answer’, ‘complaining’ and ‘disagreeing with the question’s agenda and presuppositions’. However, alongside this, the analysis evinced clients’ refocusing practices to actively (and sometimes productively) transform or deviate the course of action; a category which we have termed moving around.}},
articleno = {{1240842}},
author = {{Dionne, Frédérick and Fleischhacker, Melanie and Muntigl, Peter and Graf, Eva-Maria}},
issn = {{1664-1078}},
journal = {{FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY}},
keywords = {{business coaching,wh-questioning sequences,resistive actions,clients' resisting,conversation analysis,CONVERSATION ANALYSIS,RESISTANCE,INTERROGATIVES,PROGRESSIVITY,ORGANIZATION,PREFERENCE,DIRECTIVES,RESPONSES,REPAIR,LIFE}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{20}},
title = {{Resisting wh-questions in business coaching}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1240842}},
volume = {{15}},
year = {{2024}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: