Addition of (bio)surfactants in the biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds in air
- Author
- Paula Alejandra Lamprea Pineda (UGent) , Kristof Demeestere (UGent) , José Joaquin Gonzaléz Cortés (UGent) , Nico Boon (UGent) , Frank Devlieghere (UGent) , Herman Van Langenhove (UGent) and Christophe Walgraeve (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- The removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air is of utmost importance to safeguard both environmental quality and human well-being. However, the low aqueous solubility of hydrophobic VOCs results in poor removal in waste gas biofilters (BFs). In this study, we evaluated the addition of (bio)surfactants in three BFs (BF1 and BF2 mixture of compost and wood chips (C + WC), and BF3 filled with expanded perlite) to enhance the removal of cyclohexane and hexane from a polluted gas stream. Experiments were carried out to select two (bio)surfactants (i.e., Tween 80 and saponin) out of five (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Tween 80, surfactin, rhamnolipid and saponin) from a physical-chemical (i.e., decreasing VOC gas-liquid partitioning) and biological (i.e., the ability of the microbial consortium to grow on the (bio)surfactants) point of view. The results show that adding Tween 80 at 1 critical micelle concentration (CMC) had a slight positive effect on the removal of both VOCs, in BF1 (e.g., 7.0 ± 0.6 g cyclohexane m−3 h−1, 85 ± 2% at 163 s; compared to 6.7 ± 0.4 g cyclohexane m−3 h−1, 76 ± 2% at 163 s and 0 CMC) and BF2 (e.g., 4.3 ± 0.4 g hexane m−3 h−1, 27 ± 2% at 82 s; compared to 3.1 ± 0.7 g hexane m−3 h−1, 16 ± 4% at 82 s and 0 CMC), but a negative effect in BF3 at either 1, 3 and 9 CMC (e.g., 2.4 ± 0.4 g hexane m−3 h−1, 30 ± 4% at 163 s and 1 CMC; compared to 4.6 ± 1.0 g hexane m−3 h−1, 43 ± 8% at 163 s and 0 CMC). In contrast, the performance of all BFs improved with the addition of saponin, particularly at 3 CMC. Notably, in BF3, the elimination capacity (EC) and removal efficiency (RE) doubled for both VOCs (i.e., 9.1 ± 0.6 g cyclohexane m−3 h−1, 49 ± 3%; 4.3 ± 0.3 g hexane m−3 h−1, 25 ± 3%) compared to no biosurfactant addition (i.e., 4.5 ± 0.4 g cyclohexane m−3 h−1, 23 ± 3%; hexane 2.2 ± 0.5 g m−3 h−1, 10 ± 2%) at 82 s. Moreover, the addition of the (bio)surfactants led to a shift in the microbial consortia, with a different response in BF1–BF2 compared to BF3. This study evaluates for the first time the use of saponin in BFs, it demonstrates that cyclohexane and hexane RE can be improved by (bio)surfactant addition, and it provides recommendations for future studies in this field.
- Keywords
- Biofiltration, Cyclohexane, Hexane, SIFT-MS, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, (bio)surfactants, HENRYS LAW CONSTANTS, N-HEXANE REMOVAL, ENHANCED BIODEGRADATION, SURFACTANT, COMPOST, TOLUENE, PERFORMANCE, INDUSTRIAL, BACTERIA, SCORIA
Downloads
-
Revised manuscript - BFs surfactants clean version.pdf
- full text (Accepted manuscript)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 1.22 MB
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 6.93 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01HNA21Z92QMPKFWDW71Z5673F
- MLA
- Lamprea Pineda, Paula Alejandra, et al. “Addition of (Bio)Surfactants in the Biofiltration of Hydrophobic Volatile Organic Compounds in Air.” JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, vol. 353, 2024, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120132.
- APA
- Lamprea Pineda, P. A., Demeestere, K., Gonzaléz Cortés, J. J., Boon, N., Devlieghere, F., Van Langenhove, H., & Walgraeve, C. (2024). Addition of (bio)surfactants in the biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds in air. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120132
- Chicago author-date
- Lamprea Pineda, Paula Alejandra, Kristof Demeestere, José Joaquin Gonzaléz Cortés, Nico Boon, Frank Devlieghere, Herman Van Langenhove, and Christophe Walgraeve. 2024. “Addition of (Bio)Surfactants in the Biofiltration of Hydrophobic Volatile Organic Compounds in Air.” JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120132.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Lamprea Pineda, Paula Alejandra, Kristof Demeestere, José Joaquin Gonzaléz Cortés, Nico Boon, Frank Devlieghere, Herman Van Langenhove, and Christophe Walgraeve. 2024. “Addition of (Bio)Surfactants in the Biofiltration of Hydrophobic Volatile Organic Compounds in Air.” JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 353. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120132.
- Vancouver
- 1.Lamprea Pineda PA, Demeestere K, Gonzaléz Cortés JJ, Boon N, Devlieghere F, Van Langenhove H, et al. Addition of (bio)surfactants in the biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds in air. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. 2024;353.
- IEEE
- [1]P. A. Lamprea Pineda et al., “Addition of (bio)surfactants in the biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds in air,” JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, vol. 353, 2024.
@article{01HNA21Z92QMPKFWDW71Z5673F,
abstract = {{The removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air is of utmost importance to safeguard both environmental quality and human well-being. However, the low aqueous solubility of hydrophobic VOCs results in poor removal in waste gas biofilters (BFs). In this study, we evaluated the addition of (bio)surfactants in three BFs (BF1 and BF2 mixture of compost and wood chips (C + WC), and BF3 filled with expanded perlite) to enhance the removal of cyclohexane and hexane from a polluted gas stream. Experiments were carried out to select two (bio)surfactants (i.e., Tween 80 and saponin) out of five (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Tween 80, surfactin, rhamnolipid and saponin) from a physical-chemical (i.e., decreasing VOC gas-liquid partitioning) and biological (i.e., the ability of the microbial consortium to grow on the (bio)surfactants) point of view. The results show that adding Tween 80 at 1 critical micelle concentration (CMC) had a slight positive effect on the removal of both VOCs, in BF1 (e.g., 7.0 ± 0.6 g cyclohexane m−3 h−1, 85 ± 2% at 163 s; compared to 6.7 ± 0.4 g cyclohexane m−3 h−1, 76 ± 2% at 163 s and 0 CMC) and BF2 (e.g., 4.3 ± 0.4 g hexane m−3 h−1, 27 ± 2% at 82 s; compared to 3.1 ± 0.7 g hexane m−3 h−1, 16 ± 4% at 82 s and 0 CMC), but a negative effect in BF3 at either 1, 3 and 9 CMC (e.g., 2.4 ± 0.4 g hexane m−3 h−1, 30 ± 4% at 163 s and 1 CMC; compared to 4.6 ± 1.0 g hexane m−3 h−1, 43 ± 8% at 163 s and 0 CMC). In contrast, the performance of all BFs improved with the addition of saponin, particularly at 3 CMC. Notably, in BF3, the elimination capacity (EC) and removal efficiency (RE) doubled for both VOCs (i.e., 9.1 ± 0.6 g cyclohexane m−3 h−1, 49 ± 3%; 4.3 ± 0.3 g hexane m−3 h−1, 25 ± 3%) compared to no biosurfactant addition (i.e., 4.5 ± 0.4 g cyclohexane m−3 h−1, 23 ± 3%; hexane 2.2 ± 0.5 g m−3 h−1, 10 ± 2%) at 82 s. Moreover, the addition of the (bio)surfactants led to a shift in the microbial consortia, with a different response in BF1–BF2 compared to BF3. This study evaluates for the first time the use of saponin in BFs, it demonstrates that cyclohexane and hexane RE can be improved by (bio)surfactant addition, and it provides recommendations for future studies in this field.}},
articleno = {{120132}},
author = {{Lamprea Pineda, Paula Alejandra and Demeestere, Kristof and Gonzaléz Cortés, José Joaquin and Boon, Nico and Devlieghere, Frank and Van Langenhove, Herman and Walgraeve, Christophe}},
issn = {{0301-4797}},
journal = {{JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT}},
keywords = {{Biofiltration,Cyclohexane,Hexane,SIFT-MS,16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing,(bio)surfactants,HENRYS LAW CONSTANTS,N-HEXANE REMOVAL,ENHANCED BIODEGRADATION,SURFACTANT,COMPOST,TOLUENE,PERFORMANCE,INDUSTRIAL,BACTERIA,SCORIA}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{12}},
title = {{Addition of (bio)surfactants in the biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds in air}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120132}},
volume = {{353}},
year = {{2024}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: