Advanced search
2 files | 8.21 MB Add to list

Pore pressure measurements in saturated sand in front of an approaching EPB and laboratory investigations

(2024) ACTA GEOTECHNICA. 19(6). p.4055-4068
Author
Organization
Abstract
This paper presents measurements of total pressures and pore pressures in the mixing chamber, the pore pressures in the soil in front of an earth pressure balance (EPB) at the Botlek Rail tunnel, as well as laboratory tests on foam infiltration behavior from foam-sand mixture to saturated sand. It shows that the plastering effect at the tunnel face is less effective for an EPB shield than for a slurry shield, as the pressure fluctuations are greater in the mixing chamber for an EPB shield, suggesting a higher water leakage at the tunnel face. The difference in the development of excess pore pressure at two different locations of the EPB shield suggests the influence of the soil permeability. Foam infiltration at the tunnel face can result in a low permeable layer that restricts the ground water flow. Results from laboratory tests suggest that foam infiltration will be influenced by foam injection ratio and soil permeability. As the foam infiltration length is only limited, no low permeable layer can be formed during drilling for fine sand conditions. While a larger foam infiltration length can be expected for medium sand condition. Field measurements on the development of pore pressures in the soils at the two different locations show agreement with the conclusions from laboratory tests.
Keywords
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology, EPB, Field measurement, Foam infiltration, Laboratory tests, Pore, pressure, Plastering effect

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 4.70 MB
  • Zheng D et al Accepted Manuscript.docx
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • Word
    • |
    • 3.50 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Zheng, Dongzhu, and Adam Bezuijen. “Pore Pressure Measurements in Saturated Sand in Front of an Approaching EPB and Laboratory Investigations.” ACTA GEOTECHNICA, vol. 19, no. 6, 2024, pp. 4055–68, doi:10.1007/s11440-023-02139-1.
APA
Zheng, D., & Bezuijen, A. (2024). Pore pressure measurements in saturated sand in front of an approaching EPB and laboratory investigations. ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 19(6), 4055–4068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-02139-1
Chicago author-date
Zheng, Dongzhu, and Adam Bezuijen. 2024. “Pore Pressure Measurements in Saturated Sand in Front of an Approaching EPB and Laboratory Investigations.” ACTA GEOTECHNICA 19 (6): 4055–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-02139-1.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Zheng, Dongzhu, and Adam Bezuijen. 2024. “Pore Pressure Measurements in Saturated Sand in Front of an Approaching EPB and Laboratory Investigations.” ACTA GEOTECHNICA 19 (6): 4055–4068. doi:10.1007/s11440-023-02139-1.
Vancouver
1.
Zheng D, Bezuijen A. Pore pressure measurements in saturated sand in front of an approaching EPB and laboratory investigations. ACTA GEOTECHNICA. 2024;19(6):4055–68.
IEEE
[1]
D. Zheng and A. Bezuijen, “Pore pressure measurements in saturated sand in front of an approaching EPB and laboratory investigations,” ACTA GEOTECHNICA, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 4055–4068, 2024.
@article{01HMEDH8HBNQX3M0X4SF1DJRPS,
  abstract     = {{This paper presents measurements of total pressures and pore pressures in the mixing chamber, the pore pressures in the soil in front of an earth pressure balance (EPB) at the Botlek Rail tunnel, as well as laboratory tests on foam infiltration behavior from foam-sand mixture to saturated sand. It shows that the plastering effect at the tunnel face is less effective for an EPB shield than for a slurry shield, as the pressure fluctuations are greater in the mixing chamber for an EPB shield, suggesting a higher water leakage at the tunnel face. The difference in the development of excess pore pressure at two different locations of the EPB shield suggests the influence of the soil permeability. Foam infiltration at the tunnel face can result in a low permeable layer that restricts the ground water flow. Results from laboratory tests suggest that foam infiltration will be influenced by foam injection ratio and soil permeability. As the foam infiltration length is only limited, no low permeable layer can be formed during drilling for fine sand conditions. While a larger foam infiltration length can be expected for medium sand condition. Field measurements on the development of pore pressures in the soils at the two different locations show agreement with the conclusions from laboratory tests.}},
  author       = {{Zheng, Dongzhu and Bezuijen, Adam}},
  issn         = {{1861-1125}},
  journal      = {{ACTA GEOTECHNICA}},
  keywords     = {{Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,EPB,Field measurement,Foam infiltration,Laboratory tests,Pore,pressure,Plastering effect}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{4055--4068}},
  title        = {{Pore pressure measurements in saturated sand in front of an approaching EPB and laboratory investigations}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-02139-1}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: