Advanced search
2 files | 1.73 MB Add to list

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid and polymedicated older adults with AF : a systematic review and meta-analysis

(2024) DRUGS & AGING. 41. p.13-30
Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Aim: Polypharmacy in multimorbid older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). We aimed to systematically assess the evidence on the prevalence of PIP and its impact on adverse health outcomes in this patient group. Methods: A systematic search of the published peer-reviewed literature describing the prevalence of PIP and/or its association with adverse health outcomes in multimorbid (AF plus one comorbidity) and polymedicated (≥2 drugs) adults ≥65 years was done up to March 2023. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of PIP of (direct) oral anticoagulants ((D)OACs) was conducted using a random-effects model. Leave-one-out analysis was performed with R (version 4.2.2) and RStudio (version 2022.12.0+353). Results: Of the 12 studies included, only one reported on the prevalence of overall PIP (65%). The meta-analysis of 10 studies assessing PIP of (D)OACs produced a pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval, CI) of 35% [30%-40%], with significant heterogeneity between the included studies (I2 95%). No statistically significant association was reported in 3 studies between PIP of (D)OACs, cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality, hospital readmission, CV hospitalisation and stroke. Reported associations between PIP and major bleeding differed, with one study demonstrating a significant association (odds ratio 2.17, 95%CI 1.14-4.12) and the other study not showing such association. Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the scarce evidence regarding the prevalence of PIP and its association with adverse health outcomes in multimorbid older adults with AF. Large, prospective and better designed studies are needed. Key Points: PIP is a concern in older adults with AF due to multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. Current research on PIP in older adults with AF predominantly focuses on PIP of (D)OACs, despite the complex health profile and polypharmacy in this population. This study highlights the need for further research to comprehensively evaluate PIP and its association with adverse health outcomes in multimorbid and polymedicated older adults with AF.
Keywords
Atrial fibrillation, polypharmacy, comorbidity, inappropriate prescribing, bleeding, anticoagulants

Downloads

  • Amrouch C et al DRAA 2023 Appendices-Supplementarymaterial revisedclean.docx
    • supplementary material
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • Word
    • |
    • 52.30 KB
  • Amrouch C et al DRAA 2023.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.68 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Amrouch, Cheïma, et al. “Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Multimorbid and Polymedicated Older Adults with AF : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” DRUGS & AGING, vol. 41, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2024, pp. 13–30, doi:10.1007/s40266-023-01078-6.
APA
Amrouch, C., Vauterin, D., Amrouch, S., Grymonprez, M., Dai, L., Damiano, C., … the AFFIRMO consortium, [missing]. (2024). Potentially inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid and polymedicated older adults with AF : a systematic review and meta-analysis. DRUGS & AGING, 41, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01078-6
Chicago author-date
Amrouch, Cheïma, Delphine Vauterin, Souad Amrouch, Maxim Grymonprez, Lu Dai, Cecilia Damiano, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, et al. 2024. “Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Multimorbid and Polymedicated Older Adults with AF : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” DRUGS & AGING 41: 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01078-6.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Amrouch, Cheïma, Delphine Vauterin, Souad Amrouch, Maxim Grymonprez, Lu Dai, Cecilia Damiano, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Lies Lahousse, Dirk De Bacquer, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Davide L. Vetrano, Delphine De Smedt, Mirko Petrovic, and [missing] the AFFIRMO consortium. 2024. “Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Multimorbid and Polymedicated Older Adults with AF : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” DRUGS & AGING 41: 13–30. doi:10.1007/s40266-023-01078-6.
Vancouver
1.
Amrouch C, Vauterin D, Amrouch S, Grymonprez M, Dai L, Damiano C, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid and polymedicated older adults with AF : a systematic review and meta-analysis. DRUGS & AGING. 2024;41:13–30.
IEEE
[1]
C. Amrouch et al., “Potentially inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid and polymedicated older adults with AF : a systematic review and meta-analysis,” DRUGS & AGING, vol. 41, pp. 13–30, 2024.
@article{01HFQJGWH4QZSYWBDR12TK97KJ,
  abstract     = {{Aim: Polypharmacy in multimorbid older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). We aimed to systematically assess the evidence on the prevalence of PIP and its impact on adverse health outcomes in this patient group.
Methods: A systematic search of the published peer-reviewed literature describing the prevalence of PIP and/or its association with adverse health outcomes in multimorbid (AF plus one comorbidity) and polymedicated (≥2 drugs) adults ≥65 years was done up to March 2023. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of PIP of (direct) oral anticoagulants ((D)OACs) was conducted using a random-effects model. Leave-one-out analysis was performed with R (version 4.2.2) and RStudio (version 2022.12.0+353).
Results: Of the 12 studies included, only one reported on the prevalence of overall PIP (65%). The meta-analysis of 10 studies assessing PIP of (D)OACs produced a pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval, CI) of 35% [30%-40%], with significant heterogeneity between the included studies (I2 95%). No statistically significant association was reported in 3 studies between PIP of (D)OACs, cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality, hospital readmission, CV hospitalisation and stroke. Reported associations between PIP and major bleeding differed, with one study demonstrating a significant association (odds ratio 2.17, 95%CI 1.14-4.12) and the other study not showing such association. 
Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the scarce evidence regarding the prevalence of PIP and its association with adverse health outcomes in multimorbid older adults with AF. Large, prospective and better designed studies are needed.
Key Points: PIP is a concern in older adults with AF due to multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. Current research on PIP in older adults with AF predominantly focuses on PIP of (D)OACs, despite the complex health profile and polypharmacy in this population. This study highlights the need for further research to comprehensively evaluate PIP and its association with adverse health outcomes in multimorbid and polymedicated older adults with AF.}},
  author       = {{Amrouch, Cheïma and Vauterin, Delphine and Amrouch, Souad and Grymonprez, Maxim and Dai, Lu and Damiano, Cecilia and Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia and Lahousse, Lies and De Bacquer, Dirk and Lip, Gregory Y. H. and Vetrano, Davide L. and De Smedt, Delphine and Petrovic, Mirko and the AFFIRMO consortium, [missing]}},
  issn         = {{1170-229X}},
  journal      = {{DRUGS & AGING}},
  keywords     = {{Atrial fibrillation,polypharmacy,comorbidity,inappropriate prescribing,bleeding,anticoagulants}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{13--30}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{Potentially inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid and polymedicated older adults with AF : a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01078-6}},
  volume       = {{41}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: