@article{01HCJ93X1908YGS7YCTKAJVWPG,
  abstract     = {{A proposal to change the conserved type of Ipomoea was published in December 2020, and recommended by the Nomenclature Committee in 2023. This was done in the light of the possible negative consequences for a name change in the crop sweetpotato, which risk our proposal would significantly minimize. Recently, Munoz-Rodriguez & al. have published a rebuttal to this proposal, which we respond to here. The objections raised by these authors focus as much on the expertise and credibility of our group of authors as on the merits of our arguments. In this "rebuttal to the rebuttal", we respond to the scientific questions raised, highlight demonstrated misinterpretation of the specialised literature relevant to this discussion and counter the assertion that a reclassification of Ipomoeeae is impossible given existing evidence. While the currently recognised genera of Ipomoeeae are not all monophyletic, the proposal to change the conserved type of Ipomoea is a necessary step that will allow exploring an improved classification for the tribe Ipomoeeae, either in the form of a better recircumscription of the genera or an efficient infrageneric classification for Ipomoea. Previously published literature has not advocated for the integration of all genera into a single genus, as Munoz-Rodriguez and co-authors have incorrectly suggested, and instead have recommended a reanalysis of the high morphological diversity of the group in the context of expanded phylogenetic studies, with the possible maintenance of some of the existing genera. We believe that, in a concerted collaborative approach and with the contribution of experts from different regions and scientific backgrounds, an improved classification of Ipomoeeae that integrates the principles of monophyly and diagnosability may soon be achieved, and until when some uncertainty may need to be accommodated, with the added reassurance that, regardless of the direction of future systematic rearrangements, the stability of the scientific name of sweetpotato would be preserved.}},
  author       = {{Eserman, Lauren A. and Buril, Maria Teresa and Chatrou, Lars and Clay, Keith and Desquilbet, Thibaut E. and Ferreira, Priscila P.A. and Grande Allende, José R. and Huerta‐Ramos, Guillermo and Kojima, Roberta K. and Miller, Richard E. and More, Sushant and Moreira, André L.C. and Pastore, Mayara and Petrongari, Fernanda S. and Pisuttimarn, Ponprom and Pornpongrungrueng, Pimwadee and Rifkin, Joanna and Shimpale, Vinod B. and Sosef, Marc S.M. and Stinchcombe, John R. and Giraldes Simoes, Ana Rita}},
  issn         = {{0040-0262}},
  journal      = {{TAXON}},
  keywords     = {{Plant Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Convolvulaceae,Ipomoea,Ipomoeeae,rebuttal,PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS,ANNONACEAE,CLASSIFICATION,GENERA}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{668--672}},
  title        = {{Towards a collaborative approach to the systematics of Ipomoea : a response to the 'Rebuttal to (2786) Proposal to change the conserved type of Ipomoea, nom. cons. (Convolvulaceae)'}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13081}},
  volume       = {{73}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: