
Mentor teachers’ professional vision : a study of the differences with classroom teachers and student teachers
- Author
- Aron Decuyper (UGent) , Hanne Tack (UGent) , Karolien Keppens (UGent) , Kristof Van Damme (UGent) , Peter Lambert (UGent) and Ruben Vanderlinde (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- A crucial competence for mentor teachers is the ability to analyse classroom practices as they are expected to model effective teaching practices and to provide feedback to student teachers. This ability is referred to in the literature as professional vision. The present study assesses mentor teachers' (n = 137) professional vision regarding teacher-student interactions and differentiated instruction, using a validated video-based comparative judgement measurement instrument. The results indicate that mentor teachers have a high professional vision. It can thus be assumed that mentor teachers can support student teachers. Additionally, their professional vision is compared with that of classroom teachers (n = 996) and student teachers (n = 2168), expecting it to be significantly higher than that of classroom teachers and student teachers. The results show no significant difference between mentor teachers and classroom teachers but a significant difference between mentor teachers and student teachers. Hence, mentor teachers and classroom teachers are equally able to identify and interpret crucial aspects of effective teaching behaviour and both groups are better able than student teachers in this regard. This study contributes to the current state of the art on mentor teachers from a theoretical, empirical and methodological point of view.
- Keywords
- Education, Mentor teachers, professional vision, comparative judgement, teacher-student interactions, differentiated instruction, DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION, MATHEMATICS TEACHERS, BEGINNING TEACHERS, SELF-DETERMINATION, BLACK-BOX, PRESERVICE, VIDEO, EDUCATION, KNOWLEDGE, ACHIEVEMENT
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.56 MB
-
Decuyper A et al Accepted Manuscript.docx
- full text (Accepted manuscript)
- |
- open access
- |
- Word
- |
- 198.32 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01HBGVC5XYJG4MH561MB3XWAM7
- MLA
- Decuyper, Aron, et al. “Mentor Teachers’ Professional Vision : A Study of the Differences with Classroom Teachers and Student Teachers.” JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES, vol. 56, no. 4, 2024, pp. 496–513, doi:10.1080/00220272.2023.2258517.
- APA
- Decuyper, A., Tack, H., Keppens, K., Van Damme, K., Lambert, P., & Vanderlinde, R. (2024). Mentor teachers’ professional vision : a study of the differences with classroom teachers and student teachers. JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES, 56(4), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2258517
- Chicago author-date
- Decuyper, Aron, Hanne Tack, Karolien Keppens, Kristof Van Damme, Peter Lambert, and Ruben Vanderlinde. 2024. “Mentor Teachers’ Professional Vision : A Study of the Differences with Classroom Teachers and Student Teachers.” JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES 56 (4): 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2258517.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Decuyper, Aron, Hanne Tack, Karolien Keppens, Kristof Van Damme, Peter Lambert, and Ruben Vanderlinde. 2024. “Mentor Teachers’ Professional Vision : A Study of the Differences with Classroom Teachers and Student Teachers.” JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES 56 (4): 496–513. doi:10.1080/00220272.2023.2258517.
- Vancouver
- 1.Decuyper A, Tack H, Keppens K, Van Damme K, Lambert P, Vanderlinde R. Mentor teachers’ professional vision : a study of the differences with classroom teachers and student teachers. JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES. 2024;56(4):496–513.
- IEEE
- [1]A. Decuyper, H. Tack, K. Keppens, K. Van Damme, P. Lambert, and R. Vanderlinde, “Mentor teachers’ professional vision : a study of the differences with classroom teachers and student teachers,” JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 496–513, 2024.
@article{01HBGVC5XYJG4MH561MB3XWAM7, abstract = {{A crucial competence for mentor teachers is the ability to analyse classroom practices as they are expected to model effective teaching practices and to provide feedback to student teachers. This ability is referred to in the literature as professional vision. The present study assesses mentor teachers' (n = 137) professional vision regarding teacher-student interactions and differentiated instruction, using a validated video-based comparative judgement measurement instrument. The results indicate that mentor teachers have a high professional vision. It can thus be assumed that mentor teachers can support student teachers. Additionally, their professional vision is compared with that of classroom teachers (n = 996) and student teachers (n = 2168), expecting it to be significantly higher than that of classroom teachers and student teachers. The results show no significant difference between mentor teachers and classroom teachers but a significant difference between mentor teachers and student teachers. Hence, mentor teachers and classroom teachers are equally able to identify and interpret crucial aspects of effective teaching behaviour and both groups are better able than student teachers in this regard. This study contributes to the current state of the art on mentor teachers from a theoretical, empirical and methodological point of view.}}, author = {{Decuyper, Aron and Tack, Hanne and Keppens, Karolien and Van Damme, Kristof and Lambert, Peter and Vanderlinde, Ruben}}, issn = {{0022-0272}}, journal = {{JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES}}, keywords = {{Education,Mentor teachers,professional vision,comparative judgement,teacher-student interactions,differentiated instruction,DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION,MATHEMATICS TEACHERS,BEGINNING TEACHERS,SELF-DETERMINATION,BLACK-BOX,PRESERVICE,VIDEO,EDUCATION,KNOWLEDGE,ACHIEVEMENT}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{496--513}}, title = {{Mentor teachers’ professional vision : a study of the differences with classroom teachers and student teachers}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2258517}}, volume = {{56}}, year = {{2024}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: