Advanced search
1 file | 127.39 KB Add to list

Experiences, valuable activities, and worthwhile travel : a comparison of e-cycling and conventional cycling trips

Author
Organization
Abstract
E-cycling (EC) is often considered a simple ‘upgrade’ to conventional cycling (CC), but important differences exist between the two modes in terms of experiences, values, and worthwhileness. Using Chi2 tests, this study analyzes 8543 e-cycling and conventional cycling trips legs across eight European countries collected through the Woorti mobile app (May-December 2019) and evaluates differences in negative and positive trip experiences, valuable activities, worthwhile travel time, trip characteristics, environmental elements, and demographic characteristics. Results indicate that the appreciation of travel time by EC is linked to listening to music/podcasts, thinking, enjoyment, and irritation toward (unsatisfactory) infrastructure and congestion, implying that these trips are more solitary with higher experience expectations. CC use is linked to schedule predictability and a range of trip types, implying that these trips might be associated with trip chaining. These findings suggest important differences between EC and CC trips in terms of how they contribute to the intrinsic utility of travel, with implications for overall happiness and well-being.
Keywords
Worthwhile travel, Travel values, Travel experiences, E-cycling, Utility of travel

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 127.39 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Hook, Hannah, et al. “Experiences, Valuable Activities, and Worthwhile Travel : A Comparison of e-Cycling and Conventional Cycling Trips.” TRANSPORT TRANSITIONS: ADVANCING SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE MOBILITY, TRA CONFERENCE, 2024, VOL 4, 2025, pp. 172–77, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95284-5_25.
APA
Hook, H., Cornet, Y., & Malichová, E. (2025). Experiences, valuable activities, and worthwhile travel : a comparison of e-cycling and conventional cycling trips. TRANSPORT TRANSITIONS: ADVANCING SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE MOBILITY, TRA CONFERENCE, 2024, VOL 4, 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95284-5_25
Chicago author-date
Hook, Hannah, Yannick Cornet, and Eva Malichová. 2025. “Experiences, Valuable Activities, and Worthwhile Travel : A Comparison of e-Cycling and Conventional Cycling Trips.” In TRANSPORT TRANSITIONS: ADVANCING SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE MOBILITY, TRA CONFERENCE, 2024, VOL 4, 172–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95284-5_25.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Hook, Hannah, Yannick Cornet, and Eva Malichová. 2025. “Experiences, Valuable Activities, and Worthwhile Travel : A Comparison of e-Cycling and Conventional Cycling Trips.” In TRANSPORT TRANSITIONS: ADVANCING SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE MOBILITY, TRA CONFERENCE, 2024, VOL 4, 172–177. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95284-5_25.
Vancouver
1.
Hook H, Cornet Y, Malichová E. Experiences, valuable activities, and worthwhile travel : a comparison of e-cycling and conventional cycling trips. In: TRANSPORT TRANSITIONS: ADVANCING SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE MOBILITY, TRA CONFERENCE, 2024, VOL 4. 2025. p. 172–7.
IEEE
[1]
H. Hook, Y. Cornet, and E. Malichová, “Experiences, valuable activities, and worthwhile travel : a comparison of e-cycling and conventional cycling trips,” in TRANSPORT TRANSITIONS: ADVANCING SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE MOBILITY, TRA CONFERENCE, 2024, VOL 4, Dublin, Ireland, 2025, pp. 172–177.
@inproceedings{01HBGD896Z9ST6X05B7XHDT5VN,
  abstract     = {{E-cycling (EC) is often considered a simple ‘upgrade’ to conventional cycling (CC), but important differences exist between the two modes in terms of experiences, values, and worthwhileness. Using Chi2 tests, this study analyzes 8543 e-cycling and conventional cycling trips legs across eight European countries collected through the Woorti mobile app (May-December 2019) and evaluates differences in negative and positive trip experiences, valuable activities, worthwhile travel time, trip characteristics, environmental elements, and demographic characteristics. Results indicate that the appreciation of travel time by EC is linked to listening to music/podcasts, thinking, enjoyment, and irritation toward (unsatisfactory) infrastructure and congestion, implying that these trips are more solitary with higher experience expectations. CC use is linked to schedule predictability and a range of trip types, implying that these trips might be associated with trip chaining. These findings suggest important differences between EC and CC trips in terms of how they contribute to the intrinsic utility of travel, with implications for overall happiness and well-being.}},
  author       = {{Hook, Hannah and Cornet, Yannick and Malichová, Eva}},
  booktitle    = {{TRANSPORT TRANSITIONS: ADVANCING SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE MOBILITY, TRA CONFERENCE, 2024, VOL 4}},
  isbn         = {{9783031952838}},
  issn         = {{2196-5544}},
  keywords     = {{Worthwhile travel,Travel values,Travel experiences,E-cycling,Utility of travel}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  location     = {{Dublin, Ireland}},
  pages        = {{172--177}},
  title        = {{Experiences, valuable activities, and worthwhile travel : a comparison of e-cycling and conventional cycling trips}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95284-5_25}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: