@article{01H8XWC0Z87EFV7WJQC851E9YR,
  abstract     = {{Jesper Ahlin Marceta published an article in this journal in which he formulated his "argument from testability", stating that it is impossible, at least practically, to operationalize procedural authenticity. That is, using procedural accounts of authenticity, one cannot reliably differentiate between authentic and inauthentic desires. There are roughly two ways to respond to the argument from testability: top-down and bottom-up. Several authors have endeavored the top-down approach by trying to show that some conceptions of authenticity might be operationalizable after all. At present, however, the bottom-up approach has not been put to the test. That is, no attempt has been made to use a currently existing assessment tool to guide the development of an account of authenticity. In this paper, I will investigate what it means to develop an account of authenticity bottom-up based on measures of concordance. More specifically, I will investigate the following three research questions. First, how do concordance and authenticity relate at a conceptual level? As crucial similarities exist between these concepts, concordance measures seem to offer a good starting point for the bottom-up approach. Second, how do judgements of concordance differ from judgements of authenticity? Both their scope and the way they are justified will turn out to be different. This suggests novel ways to react to Marceta's argument from testability. Third, should we develop a theory of concordance? The positive answer to this question will point towards a central limitation of the bottom-up approach.}},
  author       = {{Debrabander, Jasper}},
  issn         = {{1386-7423}},
  journal      = {{MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY}},
  keywords     = {{Authenticity,Concordance,Bottom-up approach,DECISION-MAKING}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{583--589}},
  title        = {{Authenticity and the argument from testability : a bottom-up approach}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10166-8}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: