@article{01H7JH2H9J4RVVN44309V4805R,
  abstract     = {{Genetic relatedness figures heavily in contemporary ethical debates on egg freezing, although the arguments lack empirical-based evidence. Rather than adding another theoretical view on the moral relevance of genetic connections, this paper instead proposes an empirically grounded perspective based on two independent qualitative interview-based studies conducted in Belgium and France. Three themes emerge from our empirical data: (1) prioritizing family building; (2) centering the gestational experience of motherhood; and (3) identifying the complexities and limitations of adoption. These themes suggest that the relationship between egg freezing, genetics, biological motherhood, and adoption is highly complex and less straightforward than what is often assumed in the egg freezing debate. Our study provides more detailed insights into women's ambivalent experiences regarding those reproductive options. We discuss the ethical implications of our empirical findings and hold that pursuing genetic desire is not necessarily the main moral reason why women freeze their eggs.}},
  author       = {{Pérez‐Hernández, Yolinliztli and De Proost, Michiel}},
  issn         = {{0269-9702}},
  journal      = {{BIOETHICS}},
  keywords     = {{Belgium,egg freezing,France,genetic relatedness,motherhood,qualitative research,OOCYTE VITRIFICATION,FERTILITY,PRESERVATION,FUTURE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{7}},
  pages        = {{592--599}},
  title        = {{Egg freezing, genetic relatedness, and motherhood : a binational empirical bioethical investigation of women's views}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13163}},
  volume       = {{38}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: