Advanced search
1 file | 638.63 KB Add to list

Comparing pesticide regulations : what can Belgium (EU) and Washington State (US) learn from one another?

Author
Organization
Abstract
On a global scale, pesticide use has almost doubled since 1990, with the world market expected to reach $130 billion by the end of 2023. With a rapidly growing world population, the use of pesticides, also called plant protection products (PPP), has played an important role in increasing crop yields to ensure adequate food availability. In the early 1960s, growing concern and awareness about the potential for PPP to non-specifically affect the surrounding ecosystem led to a growing field of resistance. Governmental and intergovernmental bodies have since placed sustainable agricultural practices at the top of their agendas, leading to the use of PPP becoming an increasingly controversial topic of discussion. This policy analysis broadly describes PPP regulation systems in the US and the EU by providing historic accounts of key policy developments of PPP use and their regulations. A direct comparison between regulatory systems for PPP in the US and in the EU is then explored. Washington State and Belgium were chosen as case studies in order to provide a more detailed look into the complexities of such systems and allow for a comparative approach to examine the opportunities and challenges for policy changes. Additionally, suggestions as to what the EU and the US entities can learn from one another to improve the respective PPP regulation systems are investigated. Finally, the analysis explores the potential of strengthening transatlantic cooperation through the establishment of an intergovernmental framework that deals with collection of scientific evidence on PPP and their use. As a result, this analysis acts as a tool for policymakers to better comprehend the different approaches to PPP regulation in the US and the EU as the need to feed the growing world population becomes more urgent, all while safeguarding human and ecosystem health through well-informed policies on PPP use.
Keywords
international science diplomacy, science policy, sustainability, agriculture, pesticides

Downloads

  • ambrozaite etal jspg 22-2.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 638.63 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Ambrozaite, Ona, et al. “Comparing Pesticide Regulations : What Can Belgium (EU) and Washington State (US) Learn from One Another?” JOURNAL OF SCIENCE POLICY & GOVERNANCE, vol. 22, no. 02, 2023, doi:10.38126/jspg220201.
APA
Ambrozaite, O., Butner, K. B., Cole, D., D’Haene, E., De Rop, J., Desmedt, W., … Zhang, H. N. (2023). Comparing pesticide regulations : what can Belgium (EU) and Washington State (US) learn from one another? JOURNAL OF SCIENCE POLICY & GOVERNANCE, 22(02). https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg220201
Chicago author-date
Ambrozaite, Ona, Kirsten B. Butner, Dezmond Cole, Eline D’Haene, Jasmine De Rop, Willem Desmedt, Nathaniel Laughner, Ruben Savels, Esther Van Parys, and Hao Nick Zhang. 2023. “Comparing Pesticide Regulations : What Can Belgium (EU) and Washington State (US) Learn from One Another?” JOURNAL OF SCIENCE POLICY & GOVERNANCE 22 (02). https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg220201.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Ambrozaite, Ona, Kirsten B. Butner, Dezmond Cole, Eline D’Haene, Jasmine De Rop, Willem Desmedt, Nathaniel Laughner, Ruben Savels, Esther Van Parys, and Hao Nick Zhang. 2023. “Comparing Pesticide Regulations : What Can Belgium (EU) and Washington State (US) Learn from One Another?” JOURNAL OF SCIENCE POLICY & GOVERNANCE 22 (02). doi:10.38126/jspg220201.
Vancouver
1.
Ambrozaite O, Butner KB, Cole D, D’Haene E, De Rop J, Desmedt W, et al. Comparing pesticide regulations : what can Belgium (EU) and Washington State (US) learn from one another? JOURNAL OF SCIENCE POLICY & GOVERNANCE. 2023;22(02).
IEEE
[1]
O. Ambrozaite et al., “Comparing pesticide regulations : what can Belgium (EU) and Washington State (US) learn from one another?,” JOURNAL OF SCIENCE POLICY & GOVERNANCE, vol. 22, no. 02, 2023.
@article{01H3YCY3QH5SQMRQEJA8AETGKM,
  abstract     = {{On a global scale, pesticide use has almost doubled since 1990, with the world market expected to reach $130  billion by the end of 2023. With a rapidly growing world population, the use of pesticides, also called plant protection products (PPP), has played an important role in increasing crop yields to ensure adequate food availability. In the early 1960s, growing concern and awareness about the potential for PPP to non-specifically affect the surrounding ecosystem led to a growing field of resistance. Governmental and intergovernmental bodies have since placed sustainable agricultural practices at the top of their agendas, leading to the use of PPP becoming an increasingly controversial topic of discussion. This policy analysis broadly describes PPP regulation systems in the US and the EU by providing historic accounts of key policy developments of PPP use and their regulations. A direct comparison between regulatory systems for PPP in the US and in the EU is then explored. Washington State and Belgium were chosen as case studies in order to provide a more detailed look into the complexities of such systems and allow for a comparative approach to examine the opportunities and challenges for policy changes. Additionally, suggestions as to what the EU and the US entities can learn from one another to improve the respective PPP regulation systems are investigated. Finally, the analysis explores the potential of strengthening transatlantic cooperation through the establishment of an intergovernmental framework that deals with collection of scientific evidence on PPP and their use. As a result, this analysis acts as a tool for policymakers to better comprehend the different approaches to PPP regulation in the US and the EU as the need to feed the growing world population becomes more urgent, all while safeguarding human and ecosystem health through well-informed policies on PPP use.}},
  articleno    = {{JSPG220201}},
  author       = {{Ambrozaite, Ona and Butner, Kirsten B. and Cole, Dezmond and D'Haene, Eline and De Rop, Jasmine and Desmedt, Willem and Laughner, Nathaniel and Savels, Ruben and Van Parys, Esther and Zhang, Hao Nick}},
  issn         = {{2372-2193}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF SCIENCE POLICY & GOVERNANCE}},
  keywords     = {{international science diplomacy,science policy,sustainability,agriculture,pesticides}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{02}},
  pages        = {{19}},
  title        = {{Comparing pesticide regulations : what can Belgium (EU) and Washington State (US) learn from one another?}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.38126/jspg220201}},
  volume       = {{22}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric