Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
2 files | 2.82 MB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. How future proof is design education?...

How future proof is design education? A systematic review

Lore Brosens (UGent) , Annelies Raes, Johanna Renny Octavia and Marina Emmanouil (UGent)
(2023) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION. 33(2). p.663-683
Author
Organization
Abstract
Due to a rapidly transforming world, design education needs to adjust itself. To do so, it is essential to understand curriculum gaps in the discipline. This systematic review (n = 95) reports on these gaps and the future readiness of design curricula. The search strategy consisted of both a database search, and discipline-specific journal search in which generalised results about current or future perspectives of design education were found. Structured around the constructive alignment framework, this research found that more 21st century learning objectives focusing on skills next to domain-specific knowledge need to be incorporated, and teaching and learning activities need to be more student-centred and better aligned to industry. Related to assessment, a considerable gap was found in literature on guidelines and means for formative assessment. Design education is not yet ready for the challenges ahead, therefore, the authors hope that design departments rethink their curricula and fill the specified gaps.
Keywords
STUDIO, COLLABORATION, KNOWLEDGE, INTERDISCIPLINARY, OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES, THINKING, TEACHER, JOURNEY, MODEL, Design Education, Future-Proof Education, Constructive alignment, Systematic review, Skills for industry 4, 0, Design pedagogy

Downloads

  • Download
    (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.87 MB
  • Download
    SystematicReviewPaper.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 952.20 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Brosens, Lore, et al. “How Future Proof Is Design Education? A Systematic Review.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, vol. 33, no. 2, 2023, pp. 663–83, doi:10.1007/s10798-022-09743-4.
APA
Brosens, L., Raes, A., Octavia, J. R., & Emmanouil, M. (2023). How future proof is design education? A systematic review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 33(2), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09743-4
Chicago author-date
Brosens, Lore, Annelies Raes, Johanna Renny Octavia, and Marina Emmanouil. 2023. “How Future Proof Is Design Education? A Systematic Review.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION 33 (2): 663–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09743-4.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Brosens, Lore, Annelies Raes, Johanna Renny Octavia, and Marina Emmanouil. 2023. “How Future Proof Is Design Education? A Systematic Review.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION 33 (2): 663–683. doi:10.1007/s10798-022-09743-4.
Vancouver
1.
Brosens L, Raes A, Octavia JR, Emmanouil M. How future proof is design education? A systematic review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION. 2023;33(2):663–83.
IEEE
[1]
L. Brosens, A. Raes, J. R. Octavia, and M. Emmanouil, “How future proof is design education? A systematic review,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 663–683, 2023.
@article{01GYD9A3DGVJZJ2XAFHKT88H67,
  abstract     = {{Due to a rapidly transforming world, design education needs to adjust itself. To do so, it is essential to understand curriculum gaps in the discipline. This systematic review (n = 95) reports on these gaps and the future readiness of design curricula. The search strategy consisted of both a database search, and discipline-specific journal search in which generalised results about current or future perspectives of design education were found. Structured around the constructive alignment framework, this research found that more 21st century learning objectives focusing on skills next to domain-specific knowledge need to be incorporated, and teaching and learning activities need to be more student-centred and better aligned to industry. Related to assessment, a considerable gap was found in literature on guidelines and means for formative assessment. Design education is not yet ready for the challenges ahead, therefore, the authors hope that design departments rethink their curricula and fill the specified gaps.}},
  author       = {{Brosens, Lore and  Raes, Annelies and  Octavia, Johanna Renny and Emmanouil, Marina}},
  issn         = {{0957-7572}},
  journal      = {{INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION}},
  keywords     = {{STUDIO,COLLABORATION,KNOWLEDGE,INTERDISCIPLINARY,OPPORTUNITIES,CHALLENGES,THINKING,TEACHER,JOURNEY,MODEL,Design Education,Future-Proof Education,Constructive alignment,Systematic review,Skills for industry 4,0,Design pedagogy}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{663--683}},
  title        = {{How future proof is design education? A systematic review}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09743-4}},
  volume       = {{33}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}
Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: