Knee kinematics during staircase descent : native, after bi-cruciate retaining and bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty
- Author
- Amélie Chevalier (UGent) , Hannes Vermue (UGent) , Lauren Pringels (UGent) , Stijn Herregodts (UGent) , Kate Duquesne (UGent) , Jan Victor (UGent) and Mia Loccufier (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- Aims The goal was to evaluate tibiofemoral knee joint kinematics during stair descent, by simulat-ing the full stair descent motion in vitro. The knee joint kinematics were evaluated for two types of knee implants: bi-cruciate retaining and bi-cruciate stabilized. It was hypothesized that the bi-cruciate retaining implant better approximates native kinematics.Methods The in vitro study included 20 specimens which were tested during a full stair descent with physiological muscle forces in a dynamic knee rig. Laxity envelopes were measured by apply-ing external loading conditions in varus/valgus and internal/external direction.Results The laxity results show that both implants are capable of mimicking the native internal/ external-laxity during the controlled lowering phase. The kinematic results show that the bi-cruciate retaining implant tends to approximate the native condition better compared to bi-cruciate stabilized implant. This is valid for the internal/external rotation and the anteropos-terior translation during all phases of the stair descent, and for the compression-distraction of the knee joint during swing and controlled lowering phase.Conclusion The results show a better approximation of the native kinematics by the bi-cruciate retain-ing knee implant compared to the bi-cruciate stabilized knee implant for internal/external rotation and anteroposterior translation. Whether this will result in better patient outcomes remains to be investigated.
- Keywords
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Bi-cruciate retaining implants, Knee laxity, Total knee arthroplasty, Stair descent
Downloads
-
Published BJR.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 1.76 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01GY9YMK6YWA93FQRZHC02BZJM
- MLA
- Chevalier, Amélie, et al. “Knee Kinematics during Staircase Descent : Native, after Bi-Cruciate Retaining and Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.” BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, vol. 12, no. 4, British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2023, pp. 285–93, doi:10.1302/2046-3758.124.bjr-2022-0298.r2.
- APA
- Chevalier, A., Vermue, H., Pringels, L., Herregodts, S., Duquesne, K., Victor, J., & Loccufier, M. (2023). Knee kinematics during staircase descent : native, after bi-cruciate retaining and bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty. BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 12(4), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.124.bjr-2022-0298.r2
- Chicago author-date
- Chevalier, Amélie, Hannes Vermue, Lauren Pringels, Stijn Herregodts, Kate Duquesne, Jan Victor, and Mia Loccufier. 2023. “Knee Kinematics during Staircase Descent : Native, after Bi-Cruciate Retaining and Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.” BONE & JOINT RESEARCH 12 (4): 285–93. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.124.bjr-2022-0298.r2.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Chevalier, Amélie, Hannes Vermue, Lauren Pringels, Stijn Herregodts, Kate Duquesne, Jan Victor, and Mia Loccufier. 2023. “Knee Kinematics during Staircase Descent : Native, after Bi-Cruciate Retaining and Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.” BONE & JOINT RESEARCH 12 (4): 285–293. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.124.bjr-2022-0298.r2.
- Vancouver
- 1.Chevalier A, Vermue H, Pringels L, Herregodts S, Duquesne K, Victor J, et al. Knee kinematics during staircase descent : native, after bi-cruciate retaining and bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty. BONE & JOINT RESEARCH. 2023;12(4):285–93.
- IEEE
- [1]A. Chevalier et al., “Knee kinematics during staircase descent : native, after bi-cruciate retaining and bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty,” BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 285–293, 2023.
@article{01GY9YMK6YWA93FQRZHC02BZJM, abstract = {{Aims The goal was to evaluate tibiofemoral knee joint kinematics during stair descent, by simulat-ing the full stair descent motion in vitro. The knee joint kinematics were evaluated for two types of knee implants: bi-cruciate retaining and bi-cruciate stabilized. It was hypothesized that the bi-cruciate retaining implant better approximates native kinematics.Methods The in vitro study included 20 specimens which were tested during a full stair descent with physiological muscle forces in a dynamic knee rig. Laxity envelopes were measured by apply-ing external loading conditions in varus/valgus and internal/external direction.Results The laxity results show that both implants are capable of mimicking the native internal/ external-laxity during the controlled lowering phase. The kinematic results show that the bi-cruciate retaining implant tends to approximate the native condition better compared to bi-cruciate stabilized implant. This is valid for the internal/external rotation and the anteropos-terior translation during all phases of the stair descent, and for the compression-distraction of the knee joint during swing and controlled lowering phase.Conclusion The results show a better approximation of the native kinematics by the bi-cruciate retain-ing knee implant compared to the bi-cruciate stabilized knee implant for internal/external rotation and anteroposterior translation. Whether this will result in better patient outcomes remains to be investigated.}}, author = {{Chevalier, Amélie and Vermue, Hannes and Pringels, Lauren and Herregodts, Stijn and Duquesne, Kate and Victor, Jan and Loccufier, Mia}}, issn = {{2046-3758}}, journal = {{BONE & JOINT RESEARCH}}, keywords = {{Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery,Bi-cruciate retaining implants,Knee laxity,Total knee arthroplasty,Stair descent}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{285--293}}, publisher = {{British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery}}, title = {{Knee kinematics during staircase descent : native, after bi-cruciate retaining and bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.124.bjr-2022-0298.r2}}, volume = {{12}}, year = {{2023}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: