Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 431.59 KB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. A critical exploration of institution...

A critical exploration of institutional logics of de-institutionalisation in the field of disability policy and practice : towards a socio-spatial professional orientation

Griet Roets (UGent) , Matthias Remmery (UGent) , Dries Cautreels (UGent) , Simon Allemeersch (UGent) , Toon Benoot (UGent) and Rudi Roose (UGent)
(2022) SOCIAL WORK & SOCIETY. 20(1).
Author
Organization
Abstract
In this article, we first discuss changing professional paradigms and knowledge systems in disability policy and practice, that result in contemporary institutional conceptions and conditions of ‘de-institutionalisation’. Second, we address that the current ‘community turn’ in strategies (see Gibson, 2001; Mansell, 2006; Milligan & Wiles, 2010; Tøssebro et al., 2012; Roets et al., 2020) has gradually produced a problematic dichotomy in disability policy and practice between ‘segregated living in residential, institutional contexts’ being framed as something to avoid, and ‘inclusive living in the community’ as a desirable goal. Based on this historical sketch, the question can be asked to what extent the ‘community turn’ can be reconciled with the complex challenges involved in the provision of care and support for the most vulnerable people with disabilities, when they are constructed and treated as ‘incompetent citizens’ due to normative ableist assumptions in societies. For this reason, we suggest that a socio-spatial professional orientation might enable us to de-institutionalise this dominant dichotomy.

Downloads

  • Download
    (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 431.59 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Roets, Griet, et al. “A Critical Exploration of Institutional Logics of De-Institutionalisation in the  Field of Disability Policy and Practice : Towards a Socio-Spatial Professional  Orientation.” SOCIAL WORK & SOCIETY, vol. 20, no. 1, 2022.
APA
Roets, G., Remmery, M., Cautreels, D., Allemeersch, S., Benoot, T., & Roose, R. (2022). A critical exploration of institutional logics of de-institutionalisation in the  field of disability policy and practice : towards a socio-spatial professional  orientation. SOCIAL WORK & SOCIETY, 20(1).
Chicago author-date
Roets, Griet, Matthias Remmery, Dries Cautreels, Simon Allemeersch, Toon Benoot, and Rudi Roose. 2022. “A Critical Exploration of Institutional Logics of De-Institutionalisation in the  Field of Disability Policy and Practice : Towards a Socio-Spatial Professional  Orientation.” SOCIAL WORK & SOCIETY 20 (1).
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Roets, Griet, Matthias Remmery, Dries Cautreels, Simon Allemeersch, Toon Benoot, and Rudi Roose. 2022. “A Critical Exploration of Institutional Logics of De-Institutionalisation in the  Field of Disability Policy and Practice : Towards a Socio-Spatial Professional  Orientation.” SOCIAL WORK & SOCIETY 20 (1).
Vancouver
1.
Roets G, Remmery M, Cautreels D, Allemeersch S, Benoot T, Roose R. A critical exploration of institutional logics of de-institutionalisation in the  field of disability policy and practice : towards a socio-spatial professional  orientation. SOCIAL WORK & SOCIETY. 2022;20(1).
IEEE
[1]
G. Roets, M. Remmery, D. Cautreels, S. Allemeersch, T. Benoot, and R. Roose, “A critical exploration of institutional logics of de-institutionalisation in the  field of disability policy and practice : towards a socio-spatial professional  orientation,” SOCIAL WORK & SOCIETY, vol. 20, no. 1, 2022.
@article{01GY4Q18Y9DCZC9MXP54JZAJCP,
  abstract     = {{In this article, we first discuss changing professional paradigms and knowledge systems in 
disability policy and practice, that result in contemporary institutional conceptions and 
conditions of ‘de-institutionalisation’. Second, we address that the current ‘community turn’ 
in strategies (see Gibson, 2001; Mansell, 2006; Milligan & Wiles, 2010; Tøssebro et al., 
2012; Roets et al., 2020) has gradually produced a problematic dichotomy in disability policy 
and practice between ‘segregated living in residential, institutional contexts’ being framed as 
something to avoid, and ‘inclusive living in the community’ as a desirable goal. Based on this 
historical sketch, the question can be asked to what extent the ‘community turn’ can be 
reconciled with the complex challenges involved in the provision of care and support for the 
most vulnerable people with disabilities, when they are constructed and treated as 
‘incompetent citizens’ due to normative ableist assumptions in societies. For this reason, we 
suggest that a socio-spatial professional orientation might enable us to de-institutionalise this 
dominant dichotomy.}},
  articleno    = {{767}},
  author       = {{Roets, Griet and Remmery, Matthias and Cautreels, Dries and Allemeersch, Simon and Benoot, Toon and Roose, Rudi}},
  issn         = {{1613-8953}},
  journal      = {{SOCIAL WORK & SOCIETY}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{17}},
  title        = {{A critical exploration of institutional logics of de-institutionalisation in the  field of disability policy and practice : towards a socio-spatial professional  orientation}},
  url          = {{https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/767}},
  volume       = {{20}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}