On the relation between decision quality and autonomy in times of patient-centered care : a case study
- Author
- Jasper Debrabander
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- It is commonplace that care should be patient-centered. Nevertheless, no universally agreed-upon definition of patient-centered care exists. By consequence, the relation between patient-centered care as such and ethical principles cannot be investigated. However, some research has been performed on the relation between specific models of patient-centered care and ethical principles such as respect for autonomy and beneficence. In this article, I offer a detailed case study on the relationship between specific measures of patient-centered care and the ethical principle of respect for autonomy. Decision Quality Instruments (DQIs) are patient-centered care measures that were developed by Karen Sepucha and colleagues. The model of patient-centered care that guided the development of these DQIs pays special attention to the ethical principle of respect for autonomy. Using Jonathan Pugh's theory of rational autonomy, I will investigate how the DQIs relate to patient autonomy. After outlining Pugh's theory of rational autonomy and framing the DQIs accordingly (Part I), I will investigate whether the methodological choices made while developing these DQIs align with respect for autonomy (Part II). My analysis will indicate several tensions between DQIs and patient autonomy that could result in what I call "structural paternalism." These tensions offer us sufficient reasons, especially given the importance of the ethical principle of respect for autonomy, to initiate a more encompassing debate on the normative validity of Decision Quality Instruments. The aim of the present paper is to highlight the need for, and to offer a roadmap to, this debate.
- Keywords
- medical ethics, Patient-centered care, Decision quality, Autonomy, Paternalism, Validity
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 743.24 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01GWY1FYFJ5STF0TGH2551KEVC
- MLA
- Debrabander, Jasper. “On the Relation between Decision Quality and Autonomy in Times of Patient-Centered Care : A Case Study.” MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, vol. 25, no. 4, 2022, pp. 629–39, doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10108-w.
- APA
- Debrabander, J. (2022). On the relation between decision quality and autonomy in times of patient-centered care : a case study. MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 25(4), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10108-w
- Chicago author-date
- Debrabander, Jasper. 2022. “On the Relation between Decision Quality and Autonomy in Times of Patient-Centered Care : A Case Study.” MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY 25 (4): 629–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10108-w.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Debrabander, Jasper. 2022. “On the Relation between Decision Quality and Autonomy in Times of Patient-Centered Care : A Case Study.” MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY 25 (4): 629–639. doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10108-w.
- Vancouver
- 1.Debrabander J. On the relation between decision quality and autonomy in times of patient-centered care : a case study. MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY. 2022;25(4):629–39.
- IEEE
- [1]J. Debrabander, “On the relation between decision quality and autonomy in times of patient-centered care : a case study,” MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 629–639, 2022.
@article{01GWY1FYFJ5STF0TGH2551KEVC,
abstract = {{It is commonplace that care should be patient-centered. Nevertheless, no universally agreed-upon definition of patient-centered care exists. By consequence, the relation between patient-centered care as such and ethical principles cannot be investigated. However, some research has been performed on the relation between specific models of patient-centered care and ethical principles such as respect for autonomy and beneficence. In this article, I offer a detailed case study on the relationship between specific measures of patient-centered care and the ethical principle of respect for autonomy. Decision Quality Instruments (DQIs) are patient-centered care measures that were developed by Karen Sepucha and colleagues. The model of patient-centered care that guided the development of these DQIs pays special attention to the ethical principle of respect for autonomy. Using Jonathan Pugh's theory of rational autonomy, I will investigate how the DQIs relate to patient autonomy. After outlining Pugh's theory of rational autonomy and framing the DQIs accordingly (Part I), I will investigate whether the methodological choices made while developing these DQIs align with respect for autonomy (Part II). My analysis will indicate several tensions between DQIs and patient autonomy that could result in what I call "structural paternalism." These tensions offer us sufficient reasons, especially given the importance of the ethical principle of respect for autonomy, to initiate a more encompassing debate on the normative validity of Decision Quality Instruments. The aim of the present paper is to highlight the need for, and to offer a roadmap to, this debate.}},
author = {{Debrabander, Jasper}},
issn = {{1386-7423}},
journal = {{MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY}},
keywords = {{medical ethics,Patient-centered care,Decision quality,Autonomy,Paternalism,Validity}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{629--639}},
title = {{On the relation between decision quality and autonomy in times of patient-centered care : a case study}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10108-w}},
volume = {{25}},
year = {{2022}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: