Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 805.03 KB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Assessing deictic relational respondi...

Assessing deictic relational responding in psychosis using the implicit relational assessment procedure

Annemieke L. Hendriks, Ciara McEnteggart (UGent) , Yvonne Barnes-Holmes (UGent) , Hubert R. A. De Mey, Cilia L. M. Witteman, Gwenny T. L. Janssen and Jos I. M. Egger
(2020) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY. 20(3). p.287-299
Author
Organization
Abstract
The current study sought to investigate perspective-taking in a group of individuals diagnosed with psychosis. The Psychosis Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Psychosis-IRAP) contrasted statements and questions referring to 'psychotic' and 'non-psychotic' experiences. The IRAP and a Faux-pas (Theory of Mind) test were presented to two groups of participants: a clinical group with a diagnosis of psychosis and a control group. IRAP effects for each group were in the predicted direction and a ROC analysis showed that the IRAP correctly classified 80% of the individuals with psychosis with a sensitivity level of 84.2% and a specificity level of 27.8%. The IRAP was thus successfully used to correctly classify the population of clinical individuals. However, the study also demonstrated that the two groups were similar with regard to their level of competency on the perspective-taking IRAP. The article also discusses the relationship between the data and recent developments in RFT, in terms of relational flexibility.
Keywords
psychosis, perspective-taking, Relational Frame Theory, Implicit, Relational Assessment Procedure, PERSPECTIVE-TAKING, SOCIAL COGNITION, SCHIZOPHRENIA, CHILDREN, MIND, ELABORATION, REPERTOIRE, DEFICITS, IRAP

Downloads

  • Download
    (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 805.03 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Hendriks, Annemieke L., et al. “Assessing Deictic Relational Responding in Psychosis Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY, vol. 20, no. 3, 2020, pp. 287–99.
APA
Hendriks, A. L., McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., De Mey, H. R. A., Witteman, C. L. M., Janssen, G. T. L., & Egger, J. I. M. (2020). Assessing deictic relational responding in psychosis using the implicit relational assessment procedure. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY, 20(3), 287–299.
Chicago author-date
Hendriks, Annemieke L., Ciara McEnteggart, Yvonne Barnes-Holmes, Hubert R. A. De Mey, Cilia L. M. Witteman, Gwenny T. L. Janssen, and Jos I. M. Egger. 2020. “Assessing Deictic Relational Responding in Psychosis Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY 20 (3): 287–99.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Hendriks, Annemieke L., Ciara McEnteggart, Yvonne Barnes-Holmes, Hubert R. A. De Mey, Cilia L. M. Witteman, Gwenny T. L. Janssen, and Jos I. M. Egger. 2020. “Assessing Deictic Relational Responding in Psychosis Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY 20 (3): 287–299.
Vancouver
1.
Hendriks AL, McEnteggart C, Barnes-Holmes Y, De Mey HRA, Witteman CLM, Janssen GTL, et al. Assessing deictic relational responding in psychosis using the implicit relational assessment procedure. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY. 2020;20(3):287–99.
IEEE
[1]
A. L. Hendriks et al., “Assessing deictic relational responding in psychosis using the implicit relational assessment procedure,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 287–299, 2020.
@article{01GWRSCKX9WRYPSDCZB7WRNHZZ,
  abstract     = {{The current study sought to investigate perspective-taking in a group of individuals diagnosed with psychosis. The Psychosis Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Psychosis-IRAP) contrasted statements and questions referring to 'psychotic' and 'non-psychotic' experiences. The IRAP and a Faux-pas (Theory of Mind) test were presented to two groups of participants: a clinical group with a diagnosis of psychosis and a control group. IRAP effects for each group were in the predicted direction and a ROC analysis showed that the IRAP correctly classified 80% of the individuals with psychosis with a sensitivity level of 84.2% and a specificity level of 27.8%. The IRAP was thus successfully used to correctly classify the population of clinical individuals. However, the study also demonstrated that the two groups were similar with regard to their level of competency on the perspective-taking IRAP. The article also discusses the relationship between the data and recent developments in RFT, in terms of relational flexibility.}},
  author       = {{Hendriks, Annemieke L. and McEnteggart, Ciara and Barnes-Holmes, Yvonne and  De Mey, Hubert R. A. and  Witteman, Cilia L. M. and  Janssen, Gwenny T. L. and  Egger, Jos I. M.}},
  issn         = {{1577-7057}},
  journal      = {{INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY}},
  keywords     = {{psychosis,perspective-taking,Relational Frame Theory,Implicit,Relational Assessment Procedure,PERSPECTIVE-TAKING,SOCIAL COGNITION,SCHIZOPHRENIA,CHILDREN,MIND,ELABORATION,REPERTOIRE,DEFICITS,IRAP}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{287--299}},
  title        = {{Assessing deictic relational responding in psychosis using the implicit relational assessment procedure}},
  volume       = {{20}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}