Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 1.09 MB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. The impact of linguistic choices and ...

The impact of linguistic choices and (para-)linguistic markers on the perception of Twitter complaints by other customers : an experimental approach

Nicolas Ruytenbeek (UGent) , Sofie Decock (UGent) and Ilse Depraetere
(2023) JOURNAL OF POLITENESS RESEARCH-LANGUAGE BEHAVIOUR CULTURE. 19(1). p.87-122
Author
Organization
Abstract
This paper addresses how the realizations of different constitutive components of Twitter complaints shape the perception of these complaints by other customers. We present three experiments on French language in which we test how customer complaint perception is impacted by the realization of the complainable (Exp. 1), of the entity responsible for the complainable (Exp. 2), and of the customer's wish for the complainable to be remedied (Exp. 3). The results of Exp. 1 indicate that the perceived likelihood that the complaint will be responded to by the company is highest when the complainable is realized as a combination of an assertion + question + picture. In Exp. 2, we found that, in comparison with the use of the discourse marker dites to refer to the entity responsible for the complainable, the use of a noun phrase or the absence of this component increases perceived politeness. Finally, our data from Exp. 3 reveal that, compared to the use of an imperative to voice the customer's wish for the complainable to be remedied, "indirect" request forms, and preparatory interrogatives, in particular, are perceived as more polite, as expressing lower dissatisfaction, and as decreasing the likelihood of a response from the company.
Keywords
address terms, customer complaints, face-threat, requests, Twitter, PERCEIVED HELPFULNESS, REVIEWS, (IN)DIRECTNESS, PSYTOOLKIT

Downloads

  • Download
    Manuscript exp ACD AAM.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.09 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas, et al. “The Impact of Linguistic Choices and (Para-)Linguistic Markers on the Perception of Twitter Complaints by Other Customers : An Experimental Approach.” JOURNAL OF POLITENESS RESEARCH-LANGUAGE BEHAVIOUR CULTURE, vol. 19, no. 1, 2023, pp. 87–122, doi:10.1515/pr-2021-0031.
APA
Ruytenbeek, N., Decock, S., & Depraetere, I. (2023). The impact of linguistic choices and (para-)linguistic markers on the perception of Twitter complaints by other customers : an experimental approach. JOURNAL OF POLITENESS RESEARCH-LANGUAGE BEHAVIOUR CULTURE, 19(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2021-0031
Chicago author-date
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas, Sofie Decock, and Ilse Depraetere. 2023. “The Impact of Linguistic Choices and (Para-)Linguistic Markers on the Perception of Twitter Complaints by Other Customers : An Experimental Approach.” JOURNAL OF POLITENESS RESEARCH-LANGUAGE BEHAVIOUR CULTURE 19 (1): 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2021-0031.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas, Sofie Decock, and Ilse Depraetere. 2023. “The Impact of Linguistic Choices and (Para-)Linguistic Markers on the Perception of Twitter Complaints by Other Customers : An Experimental Approach.” JOURNAL OF POLITENESS RESEARCH-LANGUAGE BEHAVIOUR CULTURE 19 (1): 87–122. doi:10.1515/pr-2021-0031.
Vancouver
1.
Ruytenbeek N, Decock S, Depraetere I. The impact of linguistic choices and (para-)linguistic markers on the perception of Twitter complaints by other customers : an experimental approach. JOURNAL OF POLITENESS RESEARCH-LANGUAGE BEHAVIOUR CULTURE. 2023;19(1):87–122.
IEEE
[1]
N. Ruytenbeek, S. Decock, and I. Depraetere, “The impact of linguistic choices and (para-)linguistic markers on the perception of Twitter complaints by other customers : an experimental approach,” JOURNAL OF POLITENESS RESEARCH-LANGUAGE BEHAVIOUR CULTURE, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 87–122, 2023.
@article{01GVMSVMPSA9YCKSVD17DW7QVJ,
  abstract     = {{This paper addresses how the realizations of different constitutive components of Twitter complaints shape the perception of these complaints by other customers. We present three experiments on French language in which we test how customer complaint perception is impacted by the realization of the complainable (Exp. 1), of the entity responsible for the complainable (Exp. 2), and of the customer's wish for the complainable to be remedied (Exp. 3). The results of Exp. 1 indicate that the perceived likelihood that the complaint will be responded to by the company is highest when the complainable is realized as a combination of an assertion + question + picture. In Exp. 2, we found that, in comparison with the use of the discourse marker dites to refer to the entity responsible for the complainable, the use of a noun phrase or the absence of this component increases perceived politeness. Finally, our data from Exp. 3 reveal that, compared to the use of an imperative to voice the customer's wish for the complainable to be remedied, "indirect" request forms, and preparatory interrogatives, in particular, are perceived as more polite, as expressing lower dissatisfaction, and as decreasing the likelihood of a response from the company.}},
  author       = {{Ruytenbeek, Nicolas and Decock, Sofie and  Depraetere, Ilse}},
  issn         = {{1612-5681}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF POLITENESS RESEARCH-LANGUAGE BEHAVIOUR CULTURE}},
  keywords     = {{address terms,customer complaints,face-threat,requests,Twitter,PERCEIVED HELPFULNESS,REVIEWS,(IN)DIRECTNESS,PSYTOOLKIT}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{87--122}},
  title        = {{The impact of linguistic choices and (para-)linguistic markers on the perception of Twitter complaints by other customers : an experimental approach}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2021-0031}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}
Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: