Petitions for review of the European Patent Office (EPO) appeal board decisions by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal, part 5 : 'Confidence' in the European Patent Office (EPO) petition for review procedure under article 112a of the European Patent Convention (EPC)
- Author
- Julian Cockbain
- Organization
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 573.76 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01GT8ZB14NJN6W8NYXC3Z2PTFV
- MLA
- Cockbain, Julian. “Petitions for Review of the European Patent Office (EPO) Appeal Board Decisions by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal, Part 5 : ‘Confidence’ in the European Patent Office (EPO) Petition for Review Procedure under Article 112a of the European Patent Convention (EPC).” JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, vol. 17, no. 8, 2022, pp. 607–12, doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpac059.
- APA
- Cockbain, J. (2022). Petitions for review of the European Patent Office (EPO) appeal board decisions by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal, part 5 : “Confidence” in the European Patent Office (EPO) petition for review procedure under article 112a of the European Patent Convention (EPC). JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 17(8), 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac059
- Chicago author-date
- Cockbain, Julian. 2022. “Petitions for Review of the European Patent Office (EPO) Appeal Board Decisions by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal, Part 5 : ‘Confidence’ in the European Patent Office (EPO) Petition for Review Procedure under Article 112a of the European Patent Convention (EPC).” JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE 17 (8): 607–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac059.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Cockbain, Julian. 2022. “Petitions for Review of the European Patent Office (EPO) Appeal Board Decisions by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal, Part 5 : ‘Confidence’ in the European Patent Office (EPO) Petition for Review Procedure under Article 112a of the European Patent Convention (EPC).” JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE 17 (8): 607–612. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpac059.
- Vancouver
- 1.Cockbain J. Petitions for review of the European Patent Office (EPO) appeal board decisions by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal, part 5 : “Confidence” in the European Patent Office (EPO) petition for review procedure under article 112a of the European Patent Convention (EPC). JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE. 2022;17(8):607–12.
- IEEE
- [1]J. Cockbain, “Petitions for review of the European Patent Office (EPO) appeal board decisions by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal, part 5 : ‘Confidence’ in the European Patent Office (EPO) petition for review procedure under article 112a of the European Patent Convention (EPC),” JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 607–612, 2022.
@article{01GT8ZB14NJN6W8NYXC3Z2PTFV,
author = {{Cockbain, Julian}},
issn = {{1747-1532}},
journal = {{JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{8}},
pages = {{607--612}},
title = {{Petitions for review of the European Patent Office (EPO) appeal board decisions by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal, part 5 : 'Confidence' in the European Patent Office (EPO) petition for review procedure under article 112a of the European Patent Convention (EPC)}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac059}},
volume = {{17}},
year = {{2022}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric