Advanced search
1 file | 3.40 MB Add to list

Trapezius motor evoked potentials from transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation : reference data, characteristic differences and intradural motor velocities in horses

Author
Organization
Abstract
Reason for Performing StudySo far, only transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) of the extensor carpi radialis and tibialis cranialis have been documented for diagnostic evaluation in horses. These allow for differentiating whether lesions are located in either the thoraco-lumbar region or in the cervical myelum and/or brain. Transcranial trapezius MEPs further enable to distinguish between spinal and supraspinal located lesions. No normative data are available. It is unclear whether transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are interchangeable modalities. ObjectivesTo provide normative data for trapezius MEP parameters in horses for TES and TMS and to discern direct and indirect conduction routes by neurophysiological models that use anatomical geometric characteristics to relate latency times with peripheral (PCV) and central conduction velocities (CCV). MethodsTranscranial electrical stimulation-induced trapezius MEPs were obtained from twelve horses. TES and TMS-MEPs (subgroup 5 horses) were compared intra-individually. Trapezius MEPs were measured bilaterally twice at 5 intensity steps. Motoneurons were localized using nerve conduction models of the cervical and spinal accessory nerves (SAN). Predicted CCVs were verified by multifidus MEP data from two horses referred for neurophysiological assessment. ResultsMean MEP latencies revealed for TES: 13.5 (11.1-16.0)ms and TMS: 19.7 (12-29.5)ms, comprising similar to 100% direct routes and for TMS mixed direct/indirect routes of L:23/50; R:14/50. Left/right latency decreases over 10 > 50 V for TES were: -1.4/-1.8 ms and over 10 > 50% for TMS: -1.7/-3.5 ms. Direct route TMS-TES latency differences were 1.88-4.30 ms. 95% MEP amplitudes ranges for TES were: L:0.26-22 mV; R:0.5-15 mV and TMS: L:0.9 - 9.1 mV; R:1.1-7.9 mV. ConclusionThis is the first study to report normative data characterizing TES and TMS induced- trapezius MEPs in horses. The complex trapezius innervation leaves TES as the only reliable stimulation modality. Differences in latency times along the SAN route permit for estimation of the location of active motoneurons, which is of importance for clinical diagnostic purpose. SAN route lengths and latency times are governed by anatomical locations of motoneurons across C2-C5 segments. TES intensity-dependent reductions of trapezius MEP latencies are similar to limb muscles while MEP amplitudes between sides and between TES and TMS are not different. CCVs may reach 180 m/s.
Keywords
transcranial stimulation, trapezius, multifidus, spinal accessory nerve, horses, central conduction velocity, motor evoked potentials, SPINAL ACCESSORY NERVE, MUSCLE INNERVATION, FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY, CERVICAL, PLEXUS, CONDUCTION, NUCLEUS, TRACT

Downloads

  • fnins-16-851463 (1).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 3.40 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Journee, Sanne Lotte, et al. “Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials from Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation : Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses.” FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 16, Frontiers Media SA, 2022, doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.851463.
APA
Journee, S. L., Journee, H. L., Berends, H. I., Reed, S. M., Bergmann, W., de Bruijn, C. M., & Delesalle, C. (2022). Trapezius motor evoked potentials from transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation : reference data, characteristic differences and intradural motor velocities in horses. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.851463
Chicago author-date
Journee, Sanne Lotte, Henricus Louis Journee, Hanneke Irene Berends, Steven Michael Reed, Wilhelmina Bergmann, Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn, and Catherine Delesalle. 2022. “Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials from Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation : Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses.” FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.851463.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Journee, Sanne Lotte, Henricus Louis Journee, Hanneke Irene Berends, Steven Michael Reed, Wilhelmina Bergmann, Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn, and Catherine Delesalle. 2022. “Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials from Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation : Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses.” FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE 16. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.851463.
Vancouver
1.
Journee SL, Journee HL, Berends HI, Reed SM, Bergmann W, de Bruijn CM, et al. Trapezius motor evoked potentials from transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation : reference data, characteristic differences and intradural motor velocities in horses. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE. 2022;16.
IEEE
[1]
S. L. Journee et al., “Trapezius motor evoked potentials from transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation : reference data, characteristic differences and intradural motor velocities in horses,” FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 16, 2022.
@article{01GT1FM1D1D8NAG3AYM46HK4AS,
  abstract     = {{Reason for Performing StudySo far, only transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) of the extensor carpi radialis and tibialis cranialis have been documented for diagnostic evaluation in horses. These allow for differentiating whether lesions are located in either the thoraco-lumbar region or in the cervical myelum and/or brain. Transcranial trapezius MEPs further enable to distinguish between spinal and supraspinal located lesions. No normative data are available. It is unclear whether transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are interchangeable modalities. ObjectivesTo provide normative data for trapezius MEP parameters in horses for TES and TMS and to discern direct and indirect conduction routes by neurophysiological models that use anatomical geometric characteristics to relate latency times with peripheral (PCV) and central conduction velocities (CCV). MethodsTranscranial electrical stimulation-induced trapezius MEPs were obtained from twelve horses. TES and TMS-MEPs (subgroup 5 horses) were compared intra-individually. Trapezius MEPs were measured bilaterally twice at 5 intensity steps. Motoneurons were localized using nerve conduction models of the cervical and spinal accessory nerves (SAN). Predicted CCVs were verified by multifidus MEP data from two horses referred for neurophysiological assessment. ResultsMean MEP latencies revealed for TES: 13.5 (11.1-16.0)ms and TMS: 19.7 (12-29.5)ms, comprising similar to 100% direct routes and for TMS mixed direct/indirect routes of L:23/50; R:14/50. Left/right latency decreases over 10 > 50 V for TES were: -1.4/-1.8 ms and over 10 > 50% for TMS: -1.7/-3.5 ms. Direct route TMS-TES latency differences were 1.88-4.30 ms. 95% MEP amplitudes ranges for TES were: L:0.26-22 mV; R:0.5-15 mV and TMS: L:0.9 - 9.1 mV; R:1.1-7.9 mV. ConclusionThis is the first study to report normative data characterizing TES and TMS induced- trapezius MEPs in horses. The complex trapezius innervation leaves TES as the only reliable stimulation modality. Differences in latency times along the SAN route permit for estimation of the location of active motoneurons, which is of importance for clinical diagnostic purpose. SAN route lengths and latency times are governed by anatomical locations of motoneurons across C2-C5 segments. TES intensity-dependent reductions of trapezius MEP latencies are similar to limb muscles while MEP amplitudes between sides and between TES and TMS are not different. CCVs may reach 180 m/s.}},
  articleno    = {{851463}},
  author       = {{Journee, Sanne Lotte and Journee, Henricus Louis and  Berends, Hanneke Irene and  Reed, Steven Michael and  Bergmann, Wilhelmina and  de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus and Delesalle, Catherine}},
  issn         = {{1662-453X}},
  journal      = {{FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE}},
  keywords     = {{transcranial stimulation,trapezius,multifidus,spinal accessory nerve,horses,central conduction velocity,motor evoked potentials,SPINAL ACCESSORY NERVE,MUSCLE INNERVATION,FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY,CERVICAL,PLEXUS,CONDUCTION,NUCLEUS,TRACT}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{17}},
  publisher    = {{Frontiers Media SA}},
  title        = {{Trapezius motor evoked potentials from transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation : reference data, characteristic differences and intradural motor velocities in horses}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.851463}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: