Advanced search
1 file | 2.69 MB Add to list

Impact of fertilization with pig or calf slurry on antibiotic residues and resistance genes in the soil

Author
Organization
Abstract
Antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes can enter the environment via fertilization with calf and pig manure. In a longitudinal study, nine antibiotic resistance genes (tet(B), tet(L), tet(M), tet(O), tet(Q), tet(W), erm(B), erm(F) and sul2) and 56 antibiotic residues were investigated in 288 soil samples and 8 corresponding slurry samples from 6 pig farms and 2 veal farms using qPCR and LC-MS/MS, respectively. A significant increase in gene copy number of tet(M), erm(B), erm(F) and sul2 was observed in all the soil layers between sampling times prior to (T1) and 2-3 weeks after fertilization (T3). Tet(B), tet(Q) and tet(L) were least abundant in the soil among the genes tested. From 7 classes of antibiotics, 20 residues were detected in soil and slurry using an optimized and validated extraction method. Flumequine was detected in all soil samples in concentrations below 100 mu g/kg despite being detected in only half of the corresponding slurry samples. Doxycycline, oxytetracycline, lincomycin and sulfadiazine were also frequently detected in concentrations ranging from 0.1 mu g/kg to 500 mu g/kg and from 2 mu g/kg and 9480 mu g/kg in soil and slurry, respectively. Furthermore a positive association between the presence of antibiotic residues (total antibiotic load) and antibiotic resistance genes in soil was found. One possible explanation for this is a simultaneous introduction of antibiotic residues and resistance genes upon application of animal slurry.
Keywords
Antibiotic residues, Antibiotic resistance genes, Soil, Slurry, Fertilization, Environment, ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, MANURE, ABUNDANCE, PERSISTENCE, LIVESTOCK, LEVEL, SWINE, FATE

Downloads

  • mh3.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.69 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Huygens, Judith, et al. “Impact of Fertilization with Pig or Calf Slurry on Antibiotic Residues and Resistance Genes in the Soil.” SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, vol. 822, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153518.
APA
Huygens, J., Rasschaert, G., Heyndrickx, M., Dewulf, J., Van Coillie, E., Quataert, P., … Becue, I. (2022). Impact of fertilization with pig or calf slurry on antibiotic residues and resistance genes in the soil. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153518
Chicago author-date
Huygens, Judith, Geertrui Rasschaert, Marc Heyndrickx, Jeroen Dewulf, Els Van Coillie, Paul Quataert, Els Daeseleire, and Ilse Becue. 2022. “Impact of Fertilization with Pig or Calf Slurry on Antibiotic Residues and Resistance Genes in the Soil.” SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153518.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Huygens, Judith, Geertrui Rasschaert, Marc Heyndrickx, Jeroen Dewulf, Els Van Coillie, Paul Quataert, Els Daeseleire, and Ilse Becue. 2022. “Impact of Fertilization with Pig or Calf Slurry on Antibiotic Residues and Resistance Genes in the Soil.” SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 822. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153518.
Vancouver
1.
Huygens J, Rasschaert G, Heyndrickx M, Dewulf J, Van Coillie E, Quataert P, et al. Impact of fertilization with pig or calf slurry on antibiotic residues and resistance genes in the soil. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT. 2022;822.
IEEE
[1]
J. Huygens et al., “Impact of fertilization with pig or calf slurry on antibiotic residues and resistance genes in the soil,” SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, vol. 822, 2022.
@article{01GT1AV9TWEYN6D00D3HZDA410,
  abstract     = {{Antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes can enter the environment via fertilization with calf and pig manure. In a longitudinal study, nine antibiotic resistance genes (tet(B), tet(L), tet(M), tet(O), tet(Q), tet(W), erm(B), erm(F) and sul2) and 56 antibiotic residues were investigated in 288 soil samples and 8 corresponding slurry samples from 6 pig farms and 2 veal farms using qPCR and LC-MS/MS, respectively. A significant increase in gene copy number of tet(M), erm(B), erm(F) and sul2 was observed in all the soil layers between sampling times prior to (T1) and 2-3 weeks after fertilization (T3). Tet(B), tet(Q) and tet(L) were least abundant in the soil among the genes tested. From 7 classes of antibiotics, 20 residues were detected in soil and slurry using an optimized and validated extraction method. Flumequine was detected in all soil samples in concentrations below 100 mu g/kg despite being detected in only half of the corresponding slurry samples. Doxycycline, oxytetracycline, lincomycin and sulfadiazine were also frequently detected in concentrations ranging from 0.1 mu g/kg to 500 mu g/kg and from 2 mu g/kg and 9480 mu g/kg in soil and slurry, respectively. Furthermore a positive association between the presence of antibiotic residues (total antibiotic load) and antibiotic resistance genes in soil was found. One possible explanation for this is a simultaneous introduction of antibiotic residues and resistance genes upon application of animal slurry.}},
  articleno    = {{153518}},
  author       = {{Huygens, Judith and Rasschaert, Geertrui and Heyndrickx, Marc and Dewulf, Jeroen and  Van Coillie, Els and  Quataert, Paul and  Daeseleire, Els and  Becue, Ilse}},
  issn         = {{0048-9697}},
  journal      = {{SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT}},
  keywords     = {{Antibiotic residues,Antibiotic resistance genes,Soil,Slurry,Fertilization,Environment,ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE,MANURE,ABUNDANCE,PERSISTENCE,LIVESTOCK,LEVEL,SWINE,FATE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{12}},
  title        = {{Impact of fertilization with pig or calf slurry on antibiotic residues and resistance genes in the soil}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153518}},
  volume       = {{822}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: