@article{01GSF6YKQVB9BQAZBNJ7XWRFR3,
  abstract     = {{Simple Summary Over the past three decades, sows' litter sizes have been increased to improve productivity, but have also led to increased proportions of (very) low birth weight piglets, and consequently, higher pre-weaning mortality. One possible intervention to counter the increased mortality is supplementing a milk replacer. This study aimed to determine if the performance of low birth weight piglets can be improved by drenching a dense, concentrated milk replacer and whether the frequency of drenching and the severity of the low birth weight played a role. Secondly, this study compared the supplementation of the same milk replacer at two farms with different perinatal management. No effect of drenching a dense milk replacer on the survival or performance of (very) low birth weight piglets was observed, regardless of farm and, apparently, of the applied management. However, mortality rates were lower at the farm with a higher level of perinatal management, suggesting that high-quality care might have more effect on the survival of small piglets than drenching a dense milk replacer. Introducing hyperprolific sows has led to proportionally more (very) low birth weight ((V)LBW) piglets, accompanied by higher mortality. To improve the survival of (V)LBW piglets, drenching a dense milk replacer (DMR) could be applied. A first experiment evaluated the effect of drenching DMR (1 or 3 doses within 24 h after birth) to LBW ((mean litter birth weight - 1*SD) and weighing between 1 kg and 750 g) and VLBW piglets ((mean litter birth weight - 1.5*SD) and weighing less than 750 g). On days 1, 2, 3, 9, and two days post-weaning, body weight, growth, skin lesions, and mortality were monitored. No effect of DMR was observed on any of the parameters. In a second experiment, LBW piglets were supplemented with DMR (similarly to experiment 1) at two farms differing in the level of perinatal care. The same parameters were evaluated, and again none were affected by drenching DMR. Overall survival of the LBW piglets was significantly higher at the farm with high perinatal care. It can be concluded that good perinatal management is more effective in enhancing the survival of LBW piglets than drenching.}},
  articleno    = {{63}},
  author       = {{Van Tichelen, Kevin and  Prims, Sara and  Ayuso, Miriam and  Van Bockstal, Lieselotte and Van Kerschaver, Céline and Vandaele, Mario and Degroote, Jeroen and  Van Cruchten, Steven and Michiels, Joris and Van Ginneken, Chris}},
  issn         = {{2076-2615}},
  journal      = {{ANIMALS}},
  keywords     = {{COLOSTRUM INTAKE,GROWTH-PERFORMANCE,LITTER SIZE,ENERGY,SUPPLEMENTATION,ORAL SUPPLEMENTATION,PREWEANING MORTALITY,IMPACT,CARCASS,QUALITY,STRESS,pig,performance,oral supplementation,neonatal,survival,low,birthweight,milk replacer,neonatal management,perinatal management}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{18}},
  title        = {{The effect of drenching (very) low birth weight piglets with a dense, concentrated milk replacer at farms with differing farrowing management}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010063}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: