
How do profiles of teachers’ autonomy-supportive, structuring, and controlling style relate to student motivation?
- Author
- Sebastian Fierro-Suero, Nele Van Doren (UGent) , Katrien De Cocker (UGent) and Leen Haerens (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Building on the Self-Determination Theory, this study investigated the degree to which PE teachers combine different need-supportive and need-thwarting styles. In a sample of high school students (n = 673), this study examined how teachers combine autonomy-supportive and structuring styles (i.e., need-supportive) with a controlling style. Based on k-means cluster analyses, six different profiles were identified: “Outspoken Need-Supportive”, “High Need-Supportive and Controlling”, “Relatively Moderate Need-Supportive”, “Relatively High Structuring”, “Low Need-Supportive and Controlling”, and “Relatively Controlling”. Students in the “Outspoken Need-Supportive” group displayed the highest levels of autonomous motivation and the lowest levels of controlled motivation. Instead, students in the “Relatively Controlling” group displayed an opposite pattern. The other profiles fell in between. Results further showed that students in the “High Need-Supportive and Controlling” group displayed higher external regulation and amotivation, in comparison to the “Outspoken Need-Supportive” group. So, even when the teacher is additionally perceived as autonomy-supportive and structuring, the detrimental effect of a perceived controlling style is evident. Interestingly, the profile “High Need-Supportive and Controlling” and the profile “Low Need-Supportive and Controlling” yielded respectively the highest and lowest introjected regulation. In conclusion, according to the students, PE teachers rely on different combinations of need-supportive and need-thwarting styles to different degrees. When students perceive their PE teachers as highly autonomy-supportive and structuring and lowly controlling, this generates the most optimal motivational outcomes.
- Keywords
- Motivation, Self-Determination Theory, Cluster analyses
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01GQJ5VAS4P2XCRDFBMYPW0S4B
- MLA
- Fierro-Suero, Sebastian, et al. “How Do Profiles of Teachers’ Autonomy-Supportive, Structuring, and Controlling Style Relate to Student Motivation?” 8th International Self-Determination Theory Conference, Abstracts, 2023.
- APA
- Fierro-Suero, S., Van Doren, N., De Cocker, K., & Haerens, L. (2023). How do profiles of teachers’ autonomy-supportive, structuring, and controlling style relate to student motivation? 8th International Self-Determination Theory Conference, Abstracts. Presented at the 8th International Self-Determination Theory Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA.
- Chicago author-date
- Fierro-Suero, Sebastian, Nele Van Doren, Katrien De Cocker, and Leen Haerens. 2023. “How Do Profiles of Teachers’ Autonomy-Supportive, Structuring, and Controlling Style Relate to Student Motivation?” In 8th International Self-Determination Theory Conference, Abstracts.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Fierro-Suero, Sebastian, Nele Van Doren, Katrien De Cocker, and Leen Haerens. 2023. “How Do Profiles of Teachers’ Autonomy-Supportive, Structuring, and Controlling Style Relate to Student Motivation?” In 8th International Self-Determination Theory Conference, Abstracts.
- Vancouver
- 1.Fierro-Suero S, Van Doren N, De Cocker K, Haerens L. How do profiles of teachers’ autonomy-supportive, structuring, and controlling style relate to student motivation? In: 8th International Self-Determination Theory Conference, Abstracts. 2023.
- IEEE
- [1]S. Fierro-Suero, N. Van Doren, K. De Cocker, and L. Haerens, “How do profiles of teachers’ autonomy-supportive, structuring, and controlling style relate to student motivation?,” in 8th International Self-Determination Theory Conference, Abstracts, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2023.
@inproceedings{01GQJ5VAS4P2XCRDFBMYPW0S4B, abstract = {{Building on the Self-Determination Theory, this study investigated the degree to which PE teachers combine different need-supportive and need-thwarting styles. In a sample of high school students (n = 673), this study examined how teachers combine autonomy-supportive and structuring styles (i.e., need-supportive) with a controlling style. Based on k-means cluster analyses, six different profiles were identified: “Outspoken Need-Supportive”, “High Need-Supportive and Controlling”, “Relatively Moderate Need-Supportive”, “Relatively High Structuring”, “Low Need-Supportive and Controlling”, and “Relatively Controlling”. Students in the “Outspoken Need-Supportive” group displayed the highest levels of autonomous motivation and the lowest levels of controlled motivation. Instead, students in the “Relatively Controlling” group displayed an opposite pattern. The other profiles fell in between. Results further showed that students in the “High Need-Supportive and Controlling” group displayed higher external regulation and amotivation, in comparison to the “Outspoken Need-Supportive” group. So, even when the teacher is additionally perceived as autonomy-supportive and structuring, the detrimental effect of a perceived controlling style is evident. Interestingly, the profile “High Need-Supportive and Controlling” and the profile “Low Need-Supportive and Controlling” yielded respectively the highest and lowest introjected regulation. In conclusion, according to the students, PE teachers rely on different combinations of need-supportive and need-thwarting styles to different degrees. When students perceive their PE teachers as highly autonomy-supportive and structuring and lowly controlling, this generates the most optimal motivational outcomes.}}, author = {{Fierro-Suero, Sebastian and Van Doren, Nele and De Cocker, Katrien and Haerens, Leen}}, booktitle = {{8th International Self-Determination Theory Conference, Abstracts}}, keywords = {{Motivation,Self-Determination Theory,Cluster analyses}}, language = {{eng}}, location = {{Orlando, Florida, USA}}, title = {{How do profiles of teachers’ autonomy-supportive, structuring, and controlling style relate to student motivation?}}, year = {{2023}}, }