Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 2.45 MB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Observational study of the clinical v...

Observational study of the clinical value of the canine osteoarthritis staging tool

M. Stabile, Bernadette Van Ryssen (UGent) , S. Minei, Eva Coppieters (UGent) , A. Crovace, L. Lacitignola and F. Staffieri
(2022) VETERINARY JOURNAL. 283-284.
Author
Organization
Abstract
The aim of this multi-centred, cohort, prospective, observational study was to evaluate the clinical application of the canine osteoarthritis staging tool (COAST), in dogs affected by osteoarthritis (OA). In all dogs, a COAST stage was obtained based on the Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD) score and a complete orthopaedic and radiographic examination. The severity of OA (COAST stage) was scored as 1 (preclinical), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). These scores were compared with the overall subjective opinion of experienced orthopaedic surgeons who examined the dogs (Clinical Opinion). Data were analysed with descriptive statistic, multiple regression analysis, chi-square and Bland-Altman tests (P < 0.05). In total, 362 evaluations were performed in 202 dogs. Clinical Opinion had a greater proportion of stage 1 and 2 cases compared to COAST (P < 0.0001). The proportion of stage 4 cases was higher in COAST compared to Clinical Opinion (P < 0.0001). The proportions of Stage 3 cases were similar in the two evaluation systems. COAST had a strong correlation (r = 0.79; P < 0.01) with Clinical Opinion. Overall, the two evaluation systems exhibited strong agreement (mean bias 0.51). Stages 1 and 2 had weaker agreement (mean bias 1.04 and 0.75, respectively), than stage 3 and stage 4 (mean bias 0.46 and 0.0, respectively).
Keywords
General Veterinary, Animal Science and Zoology, Osteoarthritis, COAST, LOAD, Pain, Dog, PATHOGENESIS, INFLAMMATION, INSTRUMENT, DIAGNOSIS, DOGS

Downloads

  • Download
    (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.45 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Stabile, M., et al. “Observational Study of the Clinical Value of the Canine Osteoarthritis Staging Tool.” VETERINARY JOURNAL, vol. 283–284, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105832.
APA
Stabile, M., Van Ryssen, B., Minei, S., Coppieters, E., Crovace, A., Lacitignola, L., & Staffieri, F. (2022). Observational study of the clinical value of the canine osteoarthritis staging tool. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 283–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105832
Chicago author-date
Stabile, M., Bernadette Van Ryssen, S. Minei, Eva Coppieters, A. Crovace, L. Lacitignola, and F. Staffieri. 2022. “Observational Study of the Clinical Value of the Canine Osteoarthritis Staging Tool.” VETERINARY JOURNAL 283–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105832.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Stabile, M., Bernadette Van Ryssen, S. Minei, Eva Coppieters, A. Crovace, L. Lacitignola, and F. Staffieri. 2022. “Observational Study of the Clinical Value of the Canine Osteoarthritis Staging Tool.” VETERINARY JOURNAL 283–284. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105832.
Vancouver
1.
Stabile M, Van Ryssen B, Minei S, Coppieters E, Crovace A, Lacitignola L, et al. Observational study of the clinical value of the canine osteoarthritis staging tool. VETERINARY JOURNAL. 2022;283–284.
IEEE
[1]
M. Stabile et al., “Observational study of the clinical value of the canine osteoarthritis staging tool,” VETERINARY JOURNAL, vol. 283–284, 2022.
@article{01GQ7KVZ2VWEZYTVJGAZ7PQ637,
  abstract     = {{The aim of this multi-centred, cohort, prospective, observational study was to evaluate the clinical application of the canine osteoarthritis staging tool (COAST), in dogs affected by osteoarthritis (OA). In all dogs, a COAST stage was obtained based on the Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD) score and a complete orthopaedic and radiographic examination. The severity of OA (COAST stage) was scored as 1 (preclinical), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). These scores were compared with the overall subjective opinion of experienced orthopaedic surgeons who examined the dogs (Clinical Opinion). Data were analysed with descriptive statistic, multiple regression analysis, chi-square and Bland-Altman tests (P < 0.05). In total, 362 evaluations were performed in 202 dogs. Clinical Opinion had a greater proportion of stage 1 and 2 cases compared to COAST (P < 0.0001). The proportion of stage 4 cases was higher in COAST compared to Clinical Opinion (P < 0.0001). The proportions of Stage 3 cases were similar in the two evaluation systems. COAST had a strong correlation (r = 0.79; P < 0.01) with Clinical Opinion. Overall, the two evaluation systems exhibited strong agreement (mean bias 0.51). Stages 1 and 2 had weaker agreement (mean bias 1.04 and 0.75, respectively), than stage 3 and stage 4 (mean bias 0.46 and 0.0, respectively).}},
  articleno    = {{105832}},
  author       = {{Stabile, M. and Van Ryssen, Bernadette and Minei, S. and Coppieters, Eva and Crovace, A. and Lacitignola, L. and Staffieri, F.}},
  issn         = {{1090-0233}},
  journal      = {{VETERINARY JOURNAL}},
  keywords     = {{General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology,Osteoarthritis,COAST,LOAD,Pain,Dog,PATHOGENESIS,INFLAMMATION,INSTRUMENT,DIAGNOSIS,DOGS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{7}},
  title        = {{Observational study of the clinical value of the canine osteoarthritis staging tool}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105832}},
  volume       = {{283-284}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}
Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: