
Benefits of biobased fertilizers as substitutes for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers : field assessment combining minirhizotron and UAV-based spectrum sensing technologies
- Author
- Hongzhen Luo (UGent) , Kevin Dewitte (UGent) , Sofie Landschoot (UGent) , Ivona Sigurnjak (UGent) , Ana Robles Aguilar (UGent) , Evi Michels (UGent) , Stefaan De Neve (UGent) , Geert Haesaert (UGent) and Erik Meers (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
-
- Nutri2Cycle (Transition towards a more carbon and nutrient efficient agriculture in Europe)
- Abstract
- Recovery of biobased fertilizers derived from manure to replace synthetic fertilizers is considered a key strategy to close the nutrients loop for a more sustainable agricultural system. This study evaluated the nitrogen (N) fertilizer value of five biobased fertilizers [i.e., raw pig manure (PM), digestate (DIG), the liquid fraction of digestate (LFD), evaporator concentrate (EVA) and ammonia water (AW)] recovered from an integrated anaerobic digestion-centrifugation-evaporation process. The shoot and root growth of maize (Zea mays L.) under biobased fertilization was compared with the application of synthetic mineral N fertilizer, i.e., calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN). The non-invasive technologies, i.e., minirhizotron and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based spectrum sensing, were integrated with the classic plant and soil sampling to enhance the in-season monitoring of the crop and soil status. Results showed no significant difference in the canopy status, biomass yield or crop N uptake under biobased fertilization as compared to CAN, except a lower crop N uptake in DIG treatment. The total root length detected by minirhizotron revealed a higher early-stage N availability at the rooting zone under biobased fertilization as compared to CAN, probably due to the liquid form of N supplied by biobased fertilizers showing higher mobility in soil under dry conditions than the solid form of CAN. Given a high soil N supply (averagely 70-232 kg ha(-1)) in the latter growing season of this study, the higher N availability in the early growing season seemed to promote a luxury N uptake in maize plants, resulting in significantly (p < 0.05) higher N concentrations in the harvested biomass of PM, LFD and AW than that in the no-N fertilized control. Therefore, the biobased fertilizers, i.e., PM, LFD, EVA and AW have a high potential as substitutes for synthetic mineral N fertilizers, with additional value in providing easier accessible N for crops during dry seasons, especially under global warming which is supposed to cause more frequent drought all over the world.
- Keywords
- nitrogen use efficiency, biobased fertilizer, minirhizotron, unmanned aerial vehicle, soil mineral nitrogen, drought stress, luxury nitrogen uptake
Downloads
-
Luo-2022-Benefits of biobased fertilizers as substitutes for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers Field assessment combining minirhizotron and UAV-based spectrum sensing technologies.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 2.23 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01GPWS66BY6C0GGS8J4BEER4D7
- MLA
- Luo, Hongzhen, et al. “Benefits of Biobased Fertilizers as Substitutes for Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers : Field Assessment Combining Minirhizotron and UAV-Based Spectrum Sensing Technologies.” FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, vol. 10, 2022, doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.988932.
- APA
- Luo, H., Dewitte, K., Landschoot, S., Sigurnjak, I., Robles Aguilar, A., Michels, E., … Meers, E. (2022). Benefits of biobased fertilizers as substitutes for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers : field assessment combining minirhizotron and UAV-based spectrum sensing technologies. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.988932
- Chicago author-date
- Luo, Hongzhen, Kevin Dewitte, Sofie Landschoot, Ivona Sigurnjak, Ana Robles Aguilar, Evi Michels, Stefaan De Neve, Geert Haesaert, and Erik Meers. 2022. “Benefits of Biobased Fertilizers as Substitutes for Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers : Field Assessment Combining Minirhizotron and UAV-Based Spectrum Sensing Technologies.” FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.988932.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Luo, Hongzhen, Kevin Dewitte, Sofie Landschoot, Ivona Sigurnjak, Ana Robles Aguilar, Evi Michels, Stefaan De Neve, Geert Haesaert, and Erik Meers. 2022. “Benefits of Biobased Fertilizers as Substitutes for Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers : Field Assessment Combining Minirhizotron and UAV-Based Spectrum Sensing Technologies.” FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 10. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.988932.
- Vancouver
- 1.Luo H, Dewitte K, Landschoot S, Sigurnjak I, Robles Aguilar A, Michels E, et al. Benefits of biobased fertilizers as substitutes for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers : field assessment combining minirhizotron and UAV-based spectrum sensing technologies. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE. 2022;10.
- IEEE
- [1]H. Luo et al., “Benefits of biobased fertilizers as substitutes for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers : field assessment combining minirhizotron and UAV-based spectrum sensing technologies,” FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, vol. 10, 2022.
@article{01GPWS66BY6C0GGS8J4BEER4D7, abstract = {{Recovery of biobased fertilizers derived from manure to replace synthetic fertilizers is considered a key strategy to close the nutrients loop for a more sustainable agricultural system. This study evaluated the nitrogen (N) fertilizer value of five biobased fertilizers [i.e., raw pig manure (PM), digestate (DIG), the liquid fraction of digestate (LFD), evaporator concentrate (EVA) and ammonia water (AW)] recovered from an integrated anaerobic digestion-centrifugation-evaporation process. The shoot and root growth of maize (Zea mays L.) under biobased fertilization was compared with the application of synthetic mineral N fertilizer, i.e., calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN). The non-invasive technologies, i.e., minirhizotron and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based spectrum sensing, were integrated with the classic plant and soil sampling to enhance the in-season monitoring of the crop and soil status. Results showed no significant difference in the canopy status, biomass yield or crop N uptake under biobased fertilization as compared to CAN, except a lower crop N uptake in DIG treatment. The total root length detected by minirhizotron revealed a higher early-stage N availability at the rooting zone under biobased fertilization as compared to CAN, probably due to the liquid form of N supplied by biobased fertilizers showing higher mobility in soil under dry conditions than the solid form of CAN. Given a high soil N supply (averagely 70-232 kg ha(-1)) in the latter growing season of this study, the higher N availability in the early growing season seemed to promote a luxury N uptake in maize plants, resulting in significantly (p < 0.05) higher N concentrations in the harvested biomass of PM, LFD and AW than that in the no-N fertilized control. Therefore, the biobased fertilizers, i.e., PM, LFD, EVA and AW have a high potential as substitutes for synthetic mineral N fertilizers, with additional value in providing easier accessible N for crops during dry seasons, especially under global warming which is supposed to cause more frequent drought all over the world.}}, articleno = {{988932}}, author = {{Luo, Hongzhen and Dewitte, Kevin and Landschoot, Sofie and Sigurnjak, Ivona and Robles Aguilar, Ana and Michels, Evi and De Neve, Stefaan and Haesaert, Geert and Meers, Erik}}, issn = {{2296-665X}}, journal = {{FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE}}, keywords = {{nitrogen use efficiency,biobased fertilizer,minirhizotron,unmanned aerial vehicle,soil mineral nitrogen,drought stress,luxury nitrogen uptake}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{14}}, title = {{Benefits of biobased fertilizers as substitutes for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers : field assessment combining minirhizotron and UAV-based spectrum sensing technologies}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.988932}}, volume = {{10}}, year = {{2022}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: