- Author
- Job de Lange, Lawton Lanier Nalley, Wei Yang, Aaron Shew and Hans De Steur (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- This study surveyed 669 plant scientists globally to elicit how (which outcomes of gene editing), where (which continent) and what (which crops) are most likely to benefit from CRISPR research and if there is a consensus about specific barriers to commercial adoption in agriculture. Further, we disaggregated public and private plant scientists to see if there was heterogeneity in their views of the future of CRISPR research. Our findings suggest that maize and soybeans are anticipated to benefit the most from CRISPR technology with fungus and virus resistance the most common vehicle for its implementation. Across the board, plant scientists viewed consumer perception/knowledge gap to be the most impeding barrier of CRISPR adoption. Although CRISPR has been hailed as a technology that can help alleviate food insecurity and improve agricultural sustainability, our study has shown that plant scientists believe there are some large concerns about the consumer perceptions of CRISPR.
- Keywords
- GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOOD, CLIMATE-CHANGE, BREEDING TECHNOLOGIES, SECURITY, CROPS, METAANALYSIS, OPPORTUNITY, ACCEPTANCE, DEMAND, RISKS
Downloads
-
De Lange ... De Steur (2022) Future of Crispr Gene editing according to plant scientists (iscience).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 929.66 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01GK9NK8AG9MF868RBX5CV9VM7
- MLA
- de Lange, Job, et al. “The Future of CRISPR Gene Editing According to Plant Scientists.” ISCIENCE, vol. 25, no. 9, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105012.
- APA
- de Lange, J., Nalley, L. L., Yang, W., Shew, A., & De Steur, H. (2022). The future of CRISPR gene editing according to plant scientists. ISCIENCE, 25(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105012
- Chicago author-date
- Lange, Job de, Lawton Lanier Nalley, Wei Yang, Aaron Shew, and Hans De Steur. 2022. “The Future of CRISPR Gene Editing According to Plant Scientists.” ISCIENCE 25 (9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105012.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- de Lange, Job, Lawton Lanier Nalley, Wei Yang, Aaron Shew, and Hans De Steur. 2022. “The Future of CRISPR Gene Editing According to Plant Scientists.” ISCIENCE 25 (9). doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105012.
- Vancouver
- 1.de Lange J, Nalley LL, Yang W, Shew A, De Steur H. The future of CRISPR gene editing according to plant scientists. ISCIENCE. 2022;25(9).
- IEEE
- [1]J. de Lange, L. L. Nalley, W. Yang, A. Shew, and H. De Steur, “The future of CRISPR gene editing according to plant scientists,” ISCIENCE, vol. 25, no. 9, 2022.
@article{01GK9NK8AG9MF868RBX5CV9VM7,
abstract = {{This study surveyed 669 plant scientists globally to elicit how (which outcomes of gene editing), where (which continent) and what (which crops) are most likely to benefit from CRISPR research and if there is a consensus about specific barriers to commercial adoption in agriculture. Further, we disaggregated public and private plant scientists to see if there was heterogeneity in their views of the future of CRISPR research. Our findings suggest that maize and soybeans are anticipated to benefit the most from CRISPR technology with fungus and virus resistance the most common vehicle for its implementation. Across the board, plant scientists viewed consumer perception/knowledge gap to be the most impeding barrier of CRISPR adoption. Although CRISPR has been hailed as a technology that can help alleviate food insecurity and improve agricultural sustainability, our study has shown that plant scientists believe there are some large concerns about the consumer perceptions of CRISPR.}},
articleno = {{105012}},
author = {{de Lange, Job and Nalley, Lawton Lanier and Yang, Wei and Shew, Aaron and De Steur, Hans}},
issn = {{2589-0042}},
journal = {{ISCIENCE}},
keywords = {{GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOOD,CLIMATE-CHANGE,BREEDING TECHNOLOGIES,SECURITY,CROPS,METAANALYSIS,OPPORTUNITY,ACCEPTANCE,DEMAND,RISKS}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{9}},
pages = {{15}},
title = {{The future of CRISPR gene editing according to plant scientists}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105012}},
volume = {{25}},
year = {{2022}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: