Project: DISSECT: Evidence in International Human Rights Adjudication
2024-01-01 – 2025-12-31
- Abstract
Evidence is at the heart of adjudication, and adjudication at the heart of the international protection of human rights. Yet evidence in international human rights adjudication has rarely been studied. DISSECT is a ground-breaking research programme funded by the ERC through an advanced grant, which captures and compares the evidentiary regimes which have been developed by the world’s three regional human rights courts and UN human rights quasi-judicial bodies. Examining how judicial protocols and social realities impact the production and assessment of evidence, it demonstrates through concrete case studies how the finding or rejection of the factual aspects underlying complaints of human rights violations is not just a question of proof and truth but also one of ethics and power.
-
- PhD Thesis
- open access
The evidentiary practice of the European Court of Human Rights : critical reflections on its historical, institutional, and political underpinnings
(2025) -
The evidentiary system of the European Court of Human Rights in critical perspective, special issue launch
(2024) -
- Miscellaneous
- open access
Pushing states to evidence pushbacks : lessons from MH v. Croatia for intersecting domestic criminal law and international human rights
-
What’s beneath the iceberg in M.A. and Z.R. v Cyprus? The erasure of pushback evidence at borders
-
Concluding remarks
-
When is domestic violence discriminatory? From Opuz v Turkey to Volodina v Russia
-
Substantiating claims of secret migrant detention at the ECtHR
-
How does an applicant prove a state's ulterior motives under Art18 of the ECHR?
-
- Miscellaneous
- open access
Considerations which the ECtHR is not well equipped to challenge?
-
Sharing of the burden of proof in cases on racial discrimination before the ECtHR