Project: Fine-tuning GPT models for lexicography
2024-01-01 – 2025-12-31
- Abstract
Soon after the release of ChatGPT, the state of the art of generative AI in lexicography was surveyed (cf. de Schryver 2023). If one is to believe that survey, as well as many subsequent studies (esp. Lew and colleagues 2024), generative AI has now made lexicographers, as well as dictionaries themselves, redundant. However, these studies conveniently assume that because it works for English, it will work for any other language. It is time to reveal the truth. Pairing any other language with English only produces look-alikes: the lexicographic material appears to be sound, until one scratches the surface and realises that what was generated is ‘translated English’. When it comes to dictionaries for languages of limited diffusion, the use of existing models mostly produce gibberish. In this research project, various comparisons will be made between out-of-the-box, customisation and fine-tuned GPT models for lexicography, with a focus on monolingual dictionaries for undocumented Bantu languages.
-
Citing the future : the legacy of Patrick Hanks
-
100 scholarly echoes of generative AI in lexicography
-
Perceptions of language service technologies and reference works by Chinese users in the era of Generative AI
-
From user feedback on Chinese-English translation and dictionary tools, to DeepSeek as the ultimate translator and lexicographer
-
From user feedback on Chinese-English translation and dictionary tools, to DeepSeek as the ultimate translator and lexicographer
-
- Journal Article
- A1
- open access
Out-of-the-box GPTs for lexicography
-
- Journal Article
- A1
- open access
Customised GPTs for lexicography
-
Generative Artificial Intelligence & Three Lexicographic Fs : FANTASTIC for monolingual English dictionaries, FAKE for translation dictionaries, FAIL for exotic dictionaries
-
Customising LLMs for lexicography
-
The end of lexicography – welcome to the machine II