prof. dr. Eva Brems
Show
Sort by
-
Positive subsidiarity and its implications for the margin of appreciation doctrine
-
The legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights in light of its article 9 Jurisprudence : a multisided perspective
-
Universities as human rights actors
-
Human rights at the intersection of legal orders : The case of the 'Kharisiri'
-
- Miscellaneous
- open access
Third party intervention in the case R.L. and P.O. v. Russia
(2018) -
- Miscellaneous
- open access
Third party intervention in the case Minasyan and Others v. Armenia
(2018) -
Smart human rights integration
-
Fragmentation and integration in human rights law : users' perspectives
Eva Brems (UGent) and Saïla Ouald Chaib (UGent)(2018) -
Jurist voor mensenrechten en rechtvaardigheid
-
- Journal Article
- A1
- open access
“Burkini” bans in Belgian municipal swimming pools : banning as a default option
-
The Human Rights Law Clinic at Ghent University
-
Objections to antidiscrimination in the name of conscience or religion a conflicting rights approach
-
Conclusion : conflicting views on conflicting rights
-
Evans v UK, three grounds for ruling differently
-
- Journal Article
- A2
- open access
Addressing multicultural conflicts : an emphasis on procedural fairness
-
Lessons for children's rights from women's rights? Emancipation rights as distinct category of human rights
-
Head-covering bans in Belgian courtrooms and beyond : headscarf persecution and the complicity of supranational courts
-
Developing the full range of state obligations and integrating intersectionality in a case of involuntary sterilization : CEDAW Committee, 4/2004, AS v Hungary
-
Introduction : rewriting decisions from a perspective of human rights integration
-
Integrated human rights in practice : rewriting human rights decisions
Eva Brems (UGent) and Ellen Desmet (UGent)(2017)